The feasibility and acceptability of delivering a group trauma-focused intervention to children in care

Rebecca S. Davis, John Devaney, Sarah L. Halligan, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Paula Oliveira, Patrick Smith, Paul Stallard, Rebecca Kandiyali, Alice Phillips, Aalia John, Rachel M. Hiller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (SciVal)

Abstract

Objective: Young people in care (i.e., in the child welfare system) are a group who have often experienced very high rates of potentially traumatic events, including maltreatment. It is well-documented that they have high rates of trauma-related mental health difficulties, such as posttraumatic stress. To address the needs of the large number of young people who may benefit from support, scalable interventions are crucial. But also important is that they are effective and deliverable – particularly given the complexity of this group and services. We assessed a five-session group CBT-based intervention for PTSD. The primary goal was to understand core procedural and protocol uncertainties to address prior to a definitive trial.

Methods: Participants were 34 10–17 year olds in care, with moderate to severe posttraumatic stress symptoms, and their caregiver. We ran seven groups (four online), delivered in social care and NHS-based mental health teams. Data were collected via pre-, post-, 3-month follow-up questionnaires and qualitative interviews.

Results: Of the 34 participants allocated to the intervention, 27 (80%) attended at least three of the five sessions (most attended all). Caregiver attendance was lower (50%). There was generally good completion of assessment measures. Qualitatively, most participants were positive about the intervention, and many reported improvements in areas such as coping, sleep, and willingness to talk about experiences. However, there were important concerns about the lack of ongoing support, given this was a low-intensity intervention for a group who often had complex needs.

Conclusion: The intervention and research protocols were acceptable to most young people and carers. With modifications, a future definitive trial would likely be possible. However, key considerations include: how (and whether) to screen for PTSD; the trial design; and the option to embed high-intensity support (e.g., via assessing a stepped-care model).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-109
JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology
Volume64
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Jul 2024

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions

Funding

This project was funded by a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Research for Patients Benefit (RfPB) grant, awarded to RMH. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIHR.

FundersFunder number
National Institute for Health and Care Research
RfPB

    Keywords

    • PTSD
    • complex trauma
    • feasibility
    • foster care
    • group treatment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The feasibility and acceptability of delivering a group trauma-focused intervention to children in care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this