The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory

Alan Mark Forster, Nick Pilcher, Stuart Tennant, Mike David Murray, Nigel Craig, Alexander Copping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-100
JournalHigher Education Pedagogies
Volume2
Issue number1
Early online date12 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

engineering
apprenticeship
education
Teaching
experiential education
apprentice
university education
government policy
reconstruction
graduate
curriculum
industry
learning

Cite this

The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory. / Forster, Alan Mark; Pilcher, Nick; Tennant, Stuart; Murray, Mike David; Craig, Nigel; Copping, Alexander.

In: Higher Education Pedagogies, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2017, p. 79-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Forster, Alan Mark ; Pilcher, Nick ; Tennant, Stuart ; Murray, Mike David ; Craig, Nigel ; Copping, Alexander. / The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory. In: Higher Education Pedagogies. 2017 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 79-100.
@article{6316ce3904204f0d907e243c044acd1b,
title = "The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory",
abstract = "From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.",
author = "Forster, {Alan Mark} and Nick Pilcher and Stuart Tennant and Murray, {Mike David} and Nigel Craig and Alexander Copping",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "79--100",
journal = "Higher Education Pedagogies",
issn = "2375-2696",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory

AU - Forster, Alan Mark

AU - Pilcher, Nick

AU - Tennant, Stuart

AU - Murray, Mike David

AU - Craig, Nigel

AU - Copping, Alexander

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.

AB - From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530

U2 - 10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530

DO - 10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 79

EP - 100

JO - Higher Education Pedagogies

JF - Higher Education Pedagogies

SN - 2375-2696

IS - 1

ER -