The Ethical Imperative of Qualitative Methods

Developing Measures of Subjective Dimensions of Well-Being in Zambia and India

S C White, Shreya Jha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Well-being advocates state that it provides a more holistic, humanistic focus for public policy. Paradoxically, however, well-being debates tend to be dominated by highly quantitative, de-contextualised statistical methods accessible to only a minority of technical experts. This paper argues the need to reverse this trend. Drawing on original primary mixed method research in Zambia and India it shows the critical contribution of qualitative methods to the development of a quantitative model of subjective perspectives on well-being. Such contributions have a political, ethical and practical urgency if subjective measures of well-being are to be used in policy.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEthics and Social Welfare
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date21 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Zambia
qualitative method
well-being
India
statistical method
public policy
minority
expert
Well-being
Qualitative Methods
trend

Keywords

  • subjective wellbeing
  • Mixed methods
  • qualitative methods
  • India
  • Zambia
  • cross-cultural

Cite this

@article{ee9e20f6238b43638f365edfd22ddd8a,
title = "The Ethical Imperative of Qualitative Methods: Developing Measures of Subjective Dimensions of Well-Being in Zambia and India",
abstract = "Well-being advocates state that it provides a more holistic, humanistic focus for public policy. Paradoxically, however, well-being debates tend to be dominated by highly quantitative, de-contextualised statistical methods accessible to only a minority of technical experts. This paper argues the need to reverse this trend. Drawing on original primary mixed method research in Zambia and India it shows the critical contribution of qualitative methods to the development of a quantitative model of subjective perspectives on well-being. Such contributions have a political, ethical and practical urgency if subjective measures of well-being are to be used in policy.",
keywords = "subjective wellbeing, Mixed methods, qualitative methods, India, Zambia, cross-cultural",
author = "White, {S C} and Shreya Jha",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/17496535.2014.932416",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Ethics and Social Welfare",
issn = "1749-6535",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Ethical Imperative of Qualitative Methods

T2 - Developing Measures of Subjective Dimensions of Well-Being in Zambia and India

AU - White, S C

AU - Jha, Shreya

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Well-being advocates state that it provides a more holistic, humanistic focus for public policy. Paradoxically, however, well-being debates tend to be dominated by highly quantitative, de-contextualised statistical methods accessible to only a minority of technical experts. This paper argues the need to reverse this trend. Drawing on original primary mixed method research in Zambia and India it shows the critical contribution of qualitative methods to the development of a quantitative model of subjective perspectives on well-being. Such contributions have a political, ethical and practical urgency if subjective measures of well-being are to be used in policy.

AB - Well-being advocates state that it provides a more holistic, humanistic focus for public policy. Paradoxically, however, well-being debates tend to be dominated by highly quantitative, de-contextualised statistical methods accessible to only a minority of technical experts. This paper argues the need to reverse this trend. Drawing on original primary mixed method research in Zambia and India it shows the critical contribution of qualitative methods to the development of a quantitative model of subjective perspectives on well-being. Such contributions have a political, ethical and practical urgency if subjective measures of well-being are to be used in policy.

KW - subjective wellbeing

KW - Mixed methods

KW - qualitative methods

KW - India

KW - Zambia

KW - cross-cultural

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.932416

U2 - 10.1080/17496535.2014.932416

DO - 10.1080/17496535.2014.932416

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Ethics and Social Welfare

JF - Ethics and Social Welfare

SN - 1749-6535

IS - 3

ER -