The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting

Neal S Hinvest, I M Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Delay discounting and probability discounting tasks providing hypothetical rewards have commonly been used to measure levels of impulsivity and risk taking. Results have been inconsistent as to whether real, compared with hypothetical, rewards influence choice behaviour in delay discounting tasks. This experiment examined choice behaviour in 38 healthy individuals using delay and probability discounting tasks involving both real and hypothetical rewards (£0.10/£0.20), real delays, and probabilistic outcomes. It was hypothesized that choice behaviour when receiving real rewards would be less impulsive and less risky than when receiving hypothetical rewards. The tasks were designed so that a mathematical model (the multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice) could be applied to assess effects on discounting parameters. The provision of real rewards was associated with significantly decreased impulsive, but not risky, choice although the size of effect was small and was influenced by the order of presentation. Repeated presentation of both tasks increased quantity discounting but not delay or probability discounting parameters. These results indicate that the nature of the reward provided, and repetition effects, need to be taken into account when designing discounting studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1072-1084
Number of pages13
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Reward
Choice Behavior
Impulsive Behavior
Risk-Taking
Delay Discounting
Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • impulsivity
  • probability discounting
  • money
  • real reward
  • delay discounting

Cite this

The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting. / Hinvest, Neal S; Anderson, I M.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 1072-1084.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a24ddc285ff49b5aed9cd9e9cbab93e,
title = "The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting",
abstract = "Delay discounting and probability discounting tasks providing hypothetical rewards have commonly been used to measure levels of impulsivity and risk taking. Results have been inconsistent as to whether real, compared with hypothetical, rewards influence choice behaviour in delay discounting tasks. This experiment examined choice behaviour in 38 healthy individuals using delay and probability discounting tasks involving both real and hypothetical rewards (£0.10/£0.20), real delays, and probabilistic outcomes. It was hypothesized that choice behaviour when receiving real rewards would be less impulsive and less risky than when receiving hypothetical rewards. The tasks were designed so that a mathematical model (the multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice) could be applied to assess effects on discounting parameters. The provision of real rewards was associated with significantly decreased impulsive, but not risky, choice although the size of effect was small and was influenced by the order of presentation. Repeated presentation of both tasks increased quantity discounting but not delay or probability discounting parameters. These results indicate that the nature of the reward provided, and repetition effects, need to be taken into account when designing discounting studies.",
keywords = "impulsivity, probability discounting, money, real reward, delay discounting",
author = "Hinvest, {Neal S} and Anderson, {I M}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/17470210903276350",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "1072--1084",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting

AU - Hinvest, Neal S

AU - Anderson, I M

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Delay discounting and probability discounting tasks providing hypothetical rewards have commonly been used to measure levels of impulsivity and risk taking. Results have been inconsistent as to whether real, compared with hypothetical, rewards influence choice behaviour in delay discounting tasks. This experiment examined choice behaviour in 38 healthy individuals using delay and probability discounting tasks involving both real and hypothetical rewards (£0.10/£0.20), real delays, and probabilistic outcomes. It was hypothesized that choice behaviour when receiving real rewards would be less impulsive and less risky than when receiving hypothetical rewards. The tasks were designed so that a mathematical model (the multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice) could be applied to assess effects on discounting parameters. The provision of real rewards was associated with significantly decreased impulsive, but not risky, choice although the size of effect was small and was influenced by the order of presentation. Repeated presentation of both tasks increased quantity discounting but not delay or probability discounting parameters. These results indicate that the nature of the reward provided, and repetition effects, need to be taken into account when designing discounting studies.

AB - Delay discounting and probability discounting tasks providing hypothetical rewards have commonly been used to measure levels of impulsivity and risk taking. Results have been inconsistent as to whether real, compared with hypothetical, rewards influence choice behaviour in delay discounting tasks. This experiment examined choice behaviour in 38 healthy individuals using delay and probability discounting tasks involving both real and hypothetical rewards (£0.10/£0.20), real delays, and probabilistic outcomes. It was hypothesized that choice behaviour when receiving real rewards would be less impulsive and less risky than when receiving hypothetical rewards. The tasks were designed so that a mathematical model (the multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice) could be applied to assess effects on discounting parameters. The provision of real rewards was associated with significantly decreased impulsive, but not risky, choice although the size of effect was small and was influenced by the order of presentation. Repeated presentation of both tasks increased quantity discounting but not delay or probability discounting parameters. These results indicate that the nature of the reward provided, and repetition effects, need to be taken into account when designing discounting studies.

KW - impulsivity

KW - probability discounting

KW - money

KW - real reward

KW - delay discounting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952833714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210903276350

U2 - 10.1080/17470210903276350

DO - 10.1080/17470210903276350

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 1072

EP - 1084

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 6

ER -