The effects of mergers and acquisitions on the firm size distribution.

E Cefis, Orietta Marsili, H Schenk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper provides new empirical evidence on the effects of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) on the shape of the firm size distribution, by using data of the population of manufacturing firms in the Netherlands. Our analysis shows that M&As do not affect the size distribution when we consider the entire population of firms. When we focus on the firms involved in an M&A event, we observe a shift of the firm size distribution towards larger sizes. Firm size distribution becomes more concentrated around the mean, less skewed to the right hand side, and thinner at the tails as a whole. The shift toward higher sizes due to M&A is not uniform but affects firms of different sizes in different ways. While the number of firms in the lower tail decreased, the number of firms in the central size classes increased substantially and outweighed the increase in the number (and mean size) of firms in the upper tail of the distribution (consequently the overall market concentration measured by the Herfindahl index declines). M&As lead to a departure from log-normality of the firm size distribution, suggesting that external growth does not follow Gibrat’s law. Our counterfactual analysis highlights that only internal growth does not affect the shape of the size distribution of firms. On the contrary, it suggests that the change in the size distribution is almost entirely due to the external growth of the firms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Economics
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date12 Jun 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Mergers and acquisitions
Firm size distribution
Size distribution of firms
Class size
Manufacturing firms
Herfindahl index
Market concentration
Counterfactual analysis
Empirical evidence
The Netherlands
Normality

Cite this

The effects of mergers and acquisitions on the firm size distribution. / Cefis, E; Marsili, Orietta; Schenk, H.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.02.2009, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a7d942a41b3841499c7aee3418ac5632,
title = "The effects of mergers and acquisitions on the firm size distribution.",
abstract = "This paper provides new empirical evidence on the effects of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) on the shape of the firm size distribution, by using data of the population of manufacturing firms in the Netherlands. Our analysis shows that M&As do not affect the size distribution when we consider the entire population of firms. When we focus on the firms involved in an M&A event, we observe a shift of the firm size distribution towards larger sizes. Firm size distribution becomes more concentrated around the mean, less skewed to the right hand side, and thinner at the tails as a whole. The shift toward higher sizes due to M&A is not uniform but affects firms of different sizes in different ways. While the number of firms in the lower tail decreased, the number of firms in the central size classes increased substantially and outweighed the increase in the number (and mean size) of firms in the upper tail of the distribution (consequently the overall market concentration measured by the Herfindahl index declines). M&As lead to a departure from log-normality of the firm size distribution, suggesting that external growth does not follow Gibrat’s law. Our counterfactual analysis highlights that only internal growth does not affect the shape of the size distribution of firms. On the contrary, it suggests that the change in the size distribution is almost entirely due to the external growth of the firms.",
author = "E Cefis and Orietta Marsili and H Schenk",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00191-008-0105-9",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Economics",
issn = "0936-9937",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of mergers and acquisitions on the firm size distribution.

AU - Cefis, E

AU - Marsili, Orietta

AU - Schenk, H

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - This paper provides new empirical evidence on the effects of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) on the shape of the firm size distribution, by using data of the population of manufacturing firms in the Netherlands. Our analysis shows that M&As do not affect the size distribution when we consider the entire population of firms. When we focus on the firms involved in an M&A event, we observe a shift of the firm size distribution towards larger sizes. Firm size distribution becomes more concentrated around the mean, less skewed to the right hand side, and thinner at the tails as a whole. The shift toward higher sizes due to M&A is not uniform but affects firms of different sizes in different ways. While the number of firms in the lower tail decreased, the number of firms in the central size classes increased substantially and outweighed the increase in the number (and mean size) of firms in the upper tail of the distribution (consequently the overall market concentration measured by the Herfindahl index declines). M&As lead to a departure from log-normality of the firm size distribution, suggesting that external growth does not follow Gibrat’s law. Our counterfactual analysis highlights that only internal growth does not affect the shape of the size distribution of firms. On the contrary, it suggests that the change in the size distribution is almost entirely due to the external growth of the firms.

AB - This paper provides new empirical evidence on the effects of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) on the shape of the firm size distribution, by using data of the population of manufacturing firms in the Netherlands. Our analysis shows that M&As do not affect the size distribution when we consider the entire population of firms. When we focus on the firms involved in an M&A event, we observe a shift of the firm size distribution towards larger sizes. Firm size distribution becomes more concentrated around the mean, less skewed to the right hand side, and thinner at the tails as a whole. The shift toward higher sizes due to M&A is not uniform but affects firms of different sizes in different ways. While the number of firms in the lower tail decreased, the number of firms in the central size classes increased substantially and outweighed the increase in the number (and mean size) of firms in the upper tail of the distribution (consequently the overall market concentration measured by the Herfindahl index declines). M&As lead to a departure from log-normality of the firm size distribution, suggesting that external growth does not follow Gibrat’s law. Our counterfactual analysis highlights that only internal growth does not affect the shape of the size distribution of firms. On the contrary, it suggests that the change in the size distribution is almost entirely due to the external growth of the firms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58549093172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0105-9

U2 - 10.1007/s00191-008-0105-9

DO - 10.1007/s00191-008-0105-9

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Economics

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Economics

SN - 0936-9937

IS - 1

ER -