The effects of maximising the UK's Tobacco Control Score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling

Kirk Allen, Chris Kypridemos, Lirije Hyseni, Anna B. Gilmore, Peter Diggle, Margaret Whitehead, Simon Capewell, Martin O'Flaherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Smoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies.
Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.
Methods: Effect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies.
We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35 - 74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.
Results: The model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1% - 4%), from 20% to 17% in absolute terms, or by 15% in relative terms (95% CI: 7% - 21%). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31% to 25%, or a 6% reduction (95% CI: 2% - 7%).
There would be some 3300 (95% CI: 2200-4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015 - 2025, a 2% (95% CI: 1.4% - 2.9%) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4% (95% CI: 3% - 9%).
Conclusions: Further, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Coronary Disease
Smoking
Confidence Intervals
Mortality
England
Health
Vulnerable Populations
Taxes
Smoke
Population

Keywords

  • Tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), Coronary heart disease, Socioeconomic inequalities

Cite this

The effects of maximising the UK's Tobacco Control Score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling. / Allen, Kirk; Kypridemos, Chris; Hyseni, Lirije; Gilmore, Anna B.; Diggle, Peter; Whitehead, Margaret; Capewell, Simon; O'Flaherty, Martin.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 16, 01.04.2016, p. 292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allen, Kirk ; Kypridemos, Chris ; Hyseni, Lirije ; Gilmore, Anna B. ; Diggle, Peter ; Whitehead, Margaret ; Capewell, Simon ; O'Flaherty, Martin. / The effects of maximising the UK's Tobacco Control Score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling. In: BMC Public Health. 2016 ; Vol. 16. pp. 292.
@article{92d297877ffa4acc90a0dadc5db8ebf7,
title = "The effects of maximising the UK's Tobacco Control Score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling",
abstract = "Background: Smoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies.Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.Methods: Effect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies.We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35 - 74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.Results: The model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3{\%} (95{\%} Confidence Interval (CI): 1{\%} - 4{\%}), from 20{\%} to 17{\%} in absolute terms, or by 15{\%} in relative terms (95{\%} CI: 7{\%} - 21{\%}). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31{\%} to 25{\%}, or a 6{\%} reduction (95{\%} CI: 2{\%} - 7{\%}).There would be some 3300 (95{\%} CI: 2200-4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015 - 2025, a 2{\%} (95{\%} CI: 1.4{\%} - 2.9{\%}) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4{\%} (95{\%} CI: 3{\%} - 9{\%}).Conclusions: Further, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.",
keywords = "Tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), Coronary heart disease, Socioeconomic inequalities",
author = "Kirk Allen and Chris Kypridemos and Lirije Hyseni and Gilmore, {Anna B.} and Peter Diggle and Margaret Whitehead and Simon Capewell and Martin O'Flaherty",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "292",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of maximising the UK's Tobacco Control Score on inequalities in smoking prevalence and premature coronary heart disease mortality: a modelling

AU - Allen, Kirk

AU - Kypridemos, Chris

AU - Hyseni, Lirije

AU - Gilmore, Anna B.

AU - Diggle, Peter

AU - Whitehead, Margaret

AU - Capewell, Simon

AU - O'Flaherty, Martin

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background: Smoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies.Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.Methods: Effect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies.We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35 - 74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.Results: The model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1% - 4%), from 20% to 17% in absolute terms, or by 15% in relative terms (95% CI: 7% - 21%). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31% to 25%, or a 6% reduction (95% CI: 2% - 7%).There would be some 3300 (95% CI: 2200-4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015 - 2025, a 2% (95% CI: 1.4% - 2.9%) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4% (95% CI: 3% - 9%).Conclusions: Further, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.

AB - Background: Smoking is more than twice as common among the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups in England compared to the most affluent and is a major contributor to health-related inequalities. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive smoking policies in place: regular tax increases; public information campaigns; on-pack pictorial health warnings; advertising bans; cessation; and smoke-free areas. This is confirmed from its high Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) score, an expert-developed instrument for assessing the strength of tobacco control policies. However, room remains for improvement in tobacco control policies.Our aim was to evaluate the cumulative effect on smoking prevalence of improving all TCS components in England, stratified by socioeconomic circumstance.Methods: Effect sizes and socioeconomic gradients for all six types of smoking policy in the UK setting were adapted from systematic reviews, or if not available, from primary studies.We used the IMPACT Policy Model to link predicted changes in smoking prevalence to changes in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality for ages 35 - 74. Health outcomes with a time horizon of 2025 were stratified by quintiles of socioeconomic circumstance.Results: The model estimated that improving all smoking policies to achieve a maximum score on the TCS might reduce smoking prevalence in England by 3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1% - 4%), from 20% to 17% in absolute terms, or by 15% in relative terms (95% CI: 7% - 21%). The most deprived quintile would benefit more, with absolute reductions from 31% to 25%, or a 6% reduction (95% CI: 2% - 7%).There would be some 3300 (95% CI: 2200-4700) fewer premature CHD deaths between 2015 - 2025, a 2% (95% CI: 1.4% - 2.9%) reduction. The most disadvantaged quintile would benefit more, reducing absolute inequality of CHD mortality by about 4% (95% CI: 3% - 9%).Conclusions: Further, feasible improvements in tobacco control policy could substantially improve population health, and reduce health-related inequalities in England.

KW - Tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), Coronary heart disease, Socioeconomic inequalities

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

DO - 10.1186/s12889-016-2962-8

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 292

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

ER -