The effects of manipulating goal content and autonomy support climate on outcomes of a PE fitness class

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 14 Citations

Abstract

Objectives: The present study tested the potential for manipulating adolescents' goals and motives for participation in a school physical education (PE) lesson, and explored the subsequent outcomes on participant experience. Design: A cluster randomized controlled design was used to compare outcomes of four experimentally manipulated PE class conditions alongside a control group.

Method: Twenty-four classes comprising 592 students (M age = 13.74 years) were randomized to undertake one of four experimental conditions, or a control condition, during a fitness-based circuits class during a usual PE lesson. The experimental conditions comprised an autonomy-supportive or controlling climate, each with an intrinsic (health and fitness) or extrinsic (looking good to others) goal focus. The control condition comprised a neutral climate with no goal focus. The effect of experimental condition on motivational, affective, and intentional outcomes was analysed using hierarchical linear modelling.

Results: Class-level effects explained less than 10% of variance of study outcomes, suggesting that the impact of lesson manipulations was limited. Where intervention effects were significant, these were contrary to hypotheses guided by self-determination theory (SDT); participants perceived greater lesson value and formed stronger future intentions in the controlling, extrinsic goal focused condition. However, at the individual-level, findings were in line with SDT, in that perceptions of autonomy support and an intrinsic goal focus predicted positive lesson-related outcomes (i.e., motivation, effort, enjoyment, value, exercise-induced affect) and future intention to exercise (Total R2 values = .39 to .75).

Conclusions: The findings highlight the practical challenges of manipulating lesson climates in ecological PE settings.
LanguageEnglish
Pages342-352
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date20 Dec 2012
DOIs
StatusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Physical Education and Training
Physical Fitness
Climate
Personal Autonomy
Exercise
Motivation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Students
Control Groups
Health

Cite this

The effects of manipulating goal content and autonomy support climate on outcomes of a PE fitness class. / Gillison, Fiona Bridget; Standage, Martyn; Skevington, Suzie M.

In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Vol. 14, No. 3, 05.2013, p. 342-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{440797a273ea41db9b91b346ce8c943c,
title = "The effects of manipulating goal content and autonomy support climate on outcomes of a PE fitness class",
abstract = "Objectives: The present study tested the potential for manipulating adolescents' goals and motives for participation in a school physical education (PE) lesson, and explored the subsequent outcomes on participant experience. Design: A cluster randomized controlled design was used to compare outcomes of four experimentally manipulated PE class conditions alongside a control group. Method: Twenty-four classes comprising 592 students (M age = 13.74 years) were randomized to undertake one of four experimental conditions, or a control condition, during a fitness-based circuits class during a usual PE lesson. The experimental conditions comprised an autonomy-supportive or controlling climate, each with an intrinsic (health and fitness) or extrinsic (looking good to others) goal focus. The control condition comprised a neutral climate with no goal focus. The effect of experimental condition on motivational, affective, and intentional outcomes was analysed using hierarchical linear modelling. Results: Class-level effects explained less than 10{\%} of variance of study outcomes, suggesting that the impact of lesson manipulations was limited. Where intervention effects were significant, these were contrary to hypotheses guided by self-determination theory (SDT); participants perceived greater lesson value and formed stronger future intentions in the controlling, extrinsic goal focused condition. However, at the individual-level, findings were in line with SDT, in that perceptions of autonomy support and an intrinsic goal focus predicted positive lesson-related outcomes (i.e., motivation, effort, enjoyment, value, exercise-induced affect) and future intention to exercise (Total R2 values = .39 to .75). Conclusions: The findings highlight the practical challenges of manipulating lesson climates in ecological PE settings.",
author = "Gillison, {Fiona Bridget} and Martyn Standage and Skevington, {Suzie M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.11.011",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "342--352",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of manipulating goal content and autonomy support climate on outcomes of a PE fitness class

AU - Gillison, Fiona Bridget

AU - Standage, Martyn

AU - Skevington, Suzie M.

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Objectives: The present study tested the potential for manipulating adolescents' goals and motives for participation in a school physical education (PE) lesson, and explored the subsequent outcomes on participant experience. Design: A cluster randomized controlled design was used to compare outcomes of four experimentally manipulated PE class conditions alongside a control group. Method: Twenty-four classes comprising 592 students (M age = 13.74 years) were randomized to undertake one of four experimental conditions, or a control condition, during a fitness-based circuits class during a usual PE lesson. The experimental conditions comprised an autonomy-supportive or controlling climate, each with an intrinsic (health and fitness) or extrinsic (looking good to others) goal focus. The control condition comprised a neutral climate with no goal focus. The effect of experimental condition on motivational, affective, and intentional outcomes was analysed using hierarchical linear modelling. Results: Class-level effects explained less than 10% of variance of study outcomes, suggesting that the impact of lesson manipulations was limited. Where intervention effects were significant, these were contrary to hypotheses guided by self-determination theory (SDT); participants perceived greater lesson value and formed stronger future intentions in the controlling, extrinsic goal focused condition. However, at the individual-level, findings were in line with SDT, in that perceptions of autonomy support and an intrinsic goal focus predicted positive lesson-related outcomes (i.e., motivation, effort, enjoyment, value, exercise-induced affect) and future intention to exercise (Total R2 values = .39 to .75). Conclusions: The findings highlight the practical challenges of manipulating lesson climates in ecological PE settings.

AB - Objectives: The present study tested the potential for manipulating adolescents' goals and motives for participation in a school physical education (PE) lesson, and explored the subsequent outcomes on participant experience. Design: A cluster randomized controlled design was used to compare outcomes of four experimentally manipulated PE class conditions alongside a control group. Method: Twenty-four classes comprising 592 students (M age = 13.74 years) were randomized to undertake one of four experimental conditions, or a control condition, during a fitness-based circuits class during a usual PE lesson. The experimental conditions comprised an autonomy-supportive or controlling climate, each with an intrinsic (health and fitness) or extrinsic (looking good to others) goal focus. The control condition comprised a neutral climate with no goal focus. The effect of experimental condition on motivational, affective, and intentional outcomes was analysed using hierarchical linear modelling. Results: Class-level effects explained less than 10% of variance of study outcomes, suggesting that the impact of lesson manipulations was limited. Where intervention effects were significant, these were contrary to hypotheses guided by self-determination theory (SDT); participants perceived greater lesson value and formed stronger future intentions in the controlling, extrinsic goal focused condition. However, at the individual-level, findings were in line with SDT, in that perceptions of autonomy support and an intrinsic goal focus predicted positive lesson-related outcomes (i.e., motivation, effort, enjoyment, value, exercise-induced affect) and future intention to exercise (Total R2 values = .39 to .75). Conclusions: The findings highlight the practical challenges of manipulating lesson climates in ecological PE settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872735924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.11.011

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.11.011

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 342

EP - 352

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

T2 - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

IS - 3

ER -