Abstract
Partnerships with commercial actors have been proposed as a policy approach to create healthier food environments. We conducted a systematic review to assess their effectiveness for improving food environments and population health at state, national, or international levels. We searched in 14 databases and two websites for real-world evaluations published between 2010 and 2020. Study quality was appraised using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized narratively by outcome (human, food environment, policy content, and implementation progress), considering their effect direction. Seventeen studies reporting on seven PPPs in four countries were included. Most studies (n = 14) involved food reformulation, especially salt reduction. Three focused on specific settings (the eating out-of-home sector, schools, and convenience stores). There was mixed evidence that partnerships make people buy fewer calories or more school meals (n = 3 studies) or reduce product sodium content (n = 6). Some positive effects were described in one uncontrolled study each for decreasing trans-fatty acid intake and for making healthier options more available in school cafeterias, but these studies had important limitations. Five document analyses highlighted shortcomings in the partnerships, including their limited scope, failure to add value to ongoing actions, varying participation levels, and lack of implementation, monitoring, and reporting. Alternative policy approaches should be considered. This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO as CRD42020170963.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e13952 |
Journal | Obesity Reviews |
Early online date | 29 Jun 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 29 Jun 2025 |
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (England) Public Health Research Programme, Grant Number PHR NIHR128607 (obtained by C.K.). This work was also supported by the Wellcome Trust's Institutional Strategic Support Fund, UK, Grant Number 204928/Z/16/Z (obtained by L.B.). C.K. and M.P. have funding through the SPECTRUM Consortium, which is funded by the UK Prevention Research Partnership, a consortium of UK funders (UK research and innovation research councils [Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, and Natural Environment Research Council], charities [British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, the Wellcome Trust, and The Health Foundation], and government [Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, Health and Care Research Wales, NIHR, and Public Health Agency]). The funders were not involved in any part of the development, delivery, or publication of this study. This work was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (England) Public Health Research Programme, PHR NIHR128607 and Wellcome Trust's Institutional Strategic Support Fund, 204928/Z/16/Z. Funding:
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Public Health Agency | |
Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office | |
NIHR | |
Cancer Research UK | |
Natural Environment Research Council | |
Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council | |
Health Foundation | |
government | |
British Heart Foundation | |
Health and Care Research Wales | |
Economic and Social Research Council | |
National Institute for Health and Care Research | PHR NIHR128607 |
Wellcome Trust | 204928/Z/16, 204928/Z/16/Z |
Keywords
- food environment
- policy
- public–private partnership
- systematic review
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health