Abstract
We assessed the orientation of the acetabular component in 1070 primary total hip arthroplasties with hard-on-soft, small diameter bearings, aiming to determine the size and site of the target zone that optimises outcome. Outcome measures included complications, dislocations, revisions and ΔOHS (the difference between the Oxford Hip Scores pre-operatively and five years post-operatively). A wide scatter of orientation was observed (2sd 15°). Placing the component within Lewinnek's zone was not associated withimproved outcome. Of the different zone sizes tested (± 5°, ± 10° and ± 15°), only ± 15° was associated with a decreased rate of dislocation. The dislocation rate with acetabular components inside an inclination/anteversion zone of 40°/15° ± 15° was four times lower than those outside. The only zone size associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvement in OHS was ± 5°. The best outcomes (ΔOHS > 26) were achieved with a 45°/25° ± 5° zone. This study demonstrated that with traditional technology surgeons can only reliably achieve a target zone of ±15°. As the optimal zone to diminish the risk of dislocation is also ±15°, surgeons should be able to achieve this. This is the first study to demonstrate that optimal orientation of the acetabular component improves the functional outcome. However, the target zone is small (± 5°) and cannot, with current technology, be consistently achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:164-72.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 164-72 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | The Bone & Joint Journal |
| Volume | 97-B |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2015 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings. / Grammatopoulos, G; Thomas, G E R; Pandit, H; Beard, D J; Gill, H S; Murray, D W.
In: The Bone & Joint Journal, Vol. 97-B, No. 2, 02.2015, p. 164-72.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings
AU - Grammatopoulos, G
AU - Thomas, G E R
AU - Pandit, H
AU - Beard, D J
AU - Gill, H S
AU - Murray, D W
PY - 2015/2
Y1 - 2015/2
N2 - We assessed the orientation of the acetabular component in 1070 primary total hip arthroplasties with hard-on-soft, small diameter bearings, aiming to determine the size and site of the target zone that optimises outcome. Outcome measures included complications, dislocations, revisions and ΔOHS (the difference between the Oxford Hip Scores pre-operatively and five years post-operatively). A wide scatter of orientation was observed (2sd 15°). Placing the component within Lewinnek's zone was not associated withimproved outcome. Of the different zone sizes tested (± 5°, ± 10° and ± 15°), only ± 15° was associated with a decreased rate of dislocation. The dislocation rate with acetabular components inside an inclination/anteversion zone of 40°/15° ± 15° was four times lower than those outside. The only zone size associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvement in OHS was ± 5°. The best outcomes (ΔOHS > 26) were achieved with a 45°/25° ± 5° zone. This study demonstrated that with traditional technology surgeons can only reliably achieve a target zone of ±15°. As the optimal zone to diminish the risk of dislocation is also ±15°, surgeons should be able to achieve this. This is the first study to demonstrate that optimal orientation of the acetabular component improves the functional outcome. However, the target zone is small (± 5°) and cannot, with current technology, be consistently achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:164-72.
AB - We assessed the orientation of the acetabular component in 1070 primary total hip arthroplasties with hard-on-soft, small diameter bearings, aiming to determine the size and site of the target zone that optimises outcome. Outcome measures included complications, dislocations, revisions and ΔOHS (the difference between the Oxford Hip Scores pre-operatively and five years post-operatively). A wide scatter of orientation was observed (2sd 15°). Placing the component within Lewinnek's zone was not associated withimproved outcome. Of the different zone sizes tested (± 5°, ± 10° and ± 15°), only ± 15° was associated with a decreased rate of dislocation. The dislocation rate with acetabular components inside an inclination/anteversion zone of 40°/15° ± 15° was four times lower than those outside. The only zone size associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvement in OHS was ± 5°. The best outcomes (ΔOHS > 26) were achieved with a 45°/25° ± 5° zone. This study demonstrated that with traditional technology surgeons can only reliably achieve a target zone of ±15°. As the optimal zone to diminish the risk of dislocation is also ±15°, surgeons should be able to achieve this. This is the first study to demonstrate that optimal orientation of the acetabular component improves the functional outcome. However, the target zone is small (± 5°) and cannot, with current technology, be consistently achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:164-72.
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34294
U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34294
DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34294
M3 - Article
C2 - 25628277
VL - 97-B
SP - 164
EP - 172
JO - The Bone & Joint Journal
JF - The Bone & Joint Journal
SN - 2049-4394
IS - 2
ER -