The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony

Tim Valentine, Katie Maras

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 14 Citations

Abstract

Cross-examination permits styles of questioning that increase eyewitness error (e.g. leading questions). Previous research has shown that under cross-examination children change many of their initially accurate answers. An experiment is reported in which the effect of cross-examination on accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony was investigated. Twenty-two student witnesses watched a video of a staged theft, either in pairs, or individually. Paired witnesses discussed the video with their cowitnesses, but did not know they had seen slightly different versions. Participants in the co-witness condition demonstrated memory conformity and recalled less accurately than witnesses in the control condition. After approximately 4 weeks all participants were cross-examined by a trainee barrister. Following cross-examination there was no difference in accuracy between the two experimental groups. Witnesses in both conditions made many changes to their previous reports by altering both initially correct and incorrect answers. The results demonstrate negative effects of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony.
LanguageEnglish
Pages554-561
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Theft
Students
Research
Eyewitness
Witness
Testimony

Cite this

The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony. / Valentine, Tim; Maras, Katie.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2011, p. 554-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ec1b7a47b5343dc8b28c8dc74d4f68f,
title = "The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony",
abstract = "Cross-examination permits styles of questioning that increase eyewitness error (e.g. leading questions). Previous research has shown that under cross-examination children change many of their initially accurate answers. An experiment is reported in which the effect of cross-examination on accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony was investigated. Twenty-two student witnesses watched a video of a staged theft, either in pairs, or individually. Paired witnesses discussed the video with their cowitnesses, but did not know they had seen slightly different versions. Participants in the co-witness condition demonstrated memory conformity and recalled less accurately than witnesses in the control condition. After approximately 4 weeks all participants were cross-examined by a trainee barrister. Following cross-examination there was no difference in accuracy between the two experimental groups. Witnesses in both conditions made many changes to their previous reports by altering both initially correct and incorrect answers. The results demonstrate negative effects of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony.",
author = "Tim Valentine and Katie Maras",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1768",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "554--561",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony

AU - Valentine,Tim

AU - Maras,Katie

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Cross-examination permits styles of questioning that increase eyewitness error (e.g. leading questions). Previous research has shown that under cross-examination children change many of their initially accurate answers. An experiment is reported in which the effect of cross-examination on accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony was investigated. Twenty-two student witnesses watched a video of a staged theft, either in pairs, or individually. Paired witnesses discussed the video with their cowitnesses, but did not know they had seen slightly different versions. Participants in the co-witness condition demonstrated memory conformity and recalled less accurately than witnesses in the control condition. After approximately 4 weeks all participants were cross-examined by a trainee barrister. Following cross-examination there was no difference in accuracy between the two experimental groups. Witnesses in both conditions made many changes to their previous reports by altering both initially correct and incorrect answers. The results demonstrate negative effects of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony.

AB - Cross-examination permits styles of questioning that increase eyewitness error (e.g. leading questions). Previous research has shown that under cross-examination children change many of their initially accurate answers. An experiment is reported in which the effect of cross-examination on accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony was investigated. Twenty-two student witnesses watched a video of a staged theft, either in pairs, or individually. Paired witnesses discussed the video with their cowitnesses, but did not know they had seen slightly different versions. Participants in the co-witness condition demonstrated memory conformity and recalled less accurately than witnesses in the control condition. After approximately 4 weeks all participants were cross-examined by a trainee barrister. Following cross-examination there was no difference in accuracy between the two experimental groups. Witnesses in both conditions made many changes to their previous reports by altering both initially correct and incorrect answers. The results demonstrate negative effects of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960711877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1768

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1768

DO - 10.1002/acp.1768

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 554

EP - 561

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

T2 - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 4

ER -