Abstract
Theories of loan contracting in the presence of asymmetric information highlight the key role of collateral in mitigating against credit rationing. However, theory also allows for the use of collateral by ‘bad’ borrowers in order to receive better loan contract offers. In this study, we explore the extent to which collateral can affect the incidence of absolute loan denial and partial rationing associated with smaller loans than requested being offered. Using data from a large survey of UK small- and-medium enterprises, we find significant evidence on the negative effect of collateral. Our results also reveal important distinction between lines of credit and term loans, where the presence of collateral is associated with 3 % less term loan approved compared to overdraft. We argue that even the request (or offer) of collateral for a term loan indicates that either the bank or the firm believes it is a risky bet.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101320 |
| Journal | Journal of Financial Stability |
| Volume | 74 |
| Early online date | 21 Aug 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Collateral
- Credit rationing
- Entrepreneurship
- Lines of credit
- SME lending
- Term loans
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- General Economics,Econometrics and Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of collateral on small business rationing of term loans and lines of credit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS