Abstract
The world-wide inflation in executive compensation in recent years has been accompanied by an increase in the prevalence of long-term incentives. This article demonstrates how the subjectively perceived value of long-term incentives is affected by risk aversion, uncertainty aversion, and time preferences. Based on a unique empirical study which involved collecting primary data on executive preferences from around the world, and using a theoretical framework which draws on behavioral agency theory, we conclude that, while long-term incentives are perceived by executives to be effective, they are not in fact an efficient form of reward, and that this outcome is not significantly affected by cross-cultural differences. We conjecture that boards of directors, acting on behalf of shareholders, increase the size of long-term incentive awards in order to compensate executives for the perceived loss of value when compared with less risky, more certain and more immediate forms of reward.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 350-361 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of World Business |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2014 |
Keywords
- Agency theory
- Behavioral economics
- Executive compensation
- Long-term incentives
- Motivation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The economic psychology of incentives: an international study of top managers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS