The Dutch way of new public management

Jürgen Enders, Don F. Westerheijden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our paper investigates the emergence and development of quality assurance (QA) for teaching in the Netherlands since the mid-1980s. We conceptualise our paper on the background of the multi-level study of New Public Management (NPM) as a narrative of political change, as a choice of certain policy instruments and distinct organisational forms, and as a set of practical control technologies. We show how the specific policy regime of corporatist negotiations and Rechtsstaat instruments deflected QA as a ‘hard’ NPM-policy. QA has nevertheless been instrumental within a wider NPM-inspired policy mix for achieving new ways of governmental control of universities and managerialist control within universities. We conclude by arguing that an important function of QA has been to provide ‘legitimacy through procedures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-198
JournalPolicy and Society
Volume33
Early online date30 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

New Public Management
quality assurance
university
political change
legitimacy
Netherlands
narrative
Teaching

Cite this

The Dutch way of new public management. / Enders, Jürgen; Westerheijden, Don F.

In: Policy and Society, Vol. 33, 01.09.2014, p. 189-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Enders, Jürgen ; Westerheijden, Don F. / The Dutch way of new public management. In: Policy and Society. 2014 ; Vol. 33. pp. 189-198.
@article{626c702c5b6c44069ee3e29d62553b03,
title = "The Dutch way of new public management",
abstract = "Our paper investigates the emergence and development of quality assurance (QA) for teaching in the Netherlands since the mid-1980s. We conceptualise our paper on the background of the multi-level study of New Public Management (NPM) as a narrative of political change, as a choice of certain policy instruments and distinct organisational forms, and as a set of practical control technologies. We show how the specific policy regime of corporatist negotiations and Rechtsstaat instruments deflected QA as a ‘hard’ NPM-policy. QA has nevertheless been instrumental within a wider NPM-inspired policy mix for achieving new ways of governmental control of universities and managerialist control within universities. We conclude by arguing that an important function of QA has been to provide ‘legitimacy through procedures.",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Enders and Westerheijden, {Don F.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "189--198",
journal = "Policy and Society",
issn = "1449-4035",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Dutch way of new public management

AU - Enders, Jürgen

AU - Westerheijden, Don F.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Our paper investigates the emergence and development of quality assurance (QA) for teaching in the Netherlands since the mid-1980s. We conceptualise our paper on the background of the multi-level study of New Public Management (NPM) as a narrative of political change, as a choice of certain policy instruments and distinct organisational forms, and as a set of practical control technologies. We show how the specific policy regime of corporatist negotiations and Rechtsstaat instruments deflected QA as a ‘hard’ NPM-policy. QA has nevertheless been instrumental within a wider NPM-inspired policy mix for achieving new ways of governmental control of universities and managerialist control within universities. We conclude by arguing that an important function of QA has been to provide ‘legitimacy through procedures.

AB - Our paper investigates the emergence and development of quality assurance (QA) for teaching in the Netherlands since the mid-1980s. We conceptualise our paper on the background of the multi-level study of New Public Management (NPM) as a narrative of political change, as a choice of certain policy instruments and distinct organisational forms, and as a set of practical control technologies. We show how the specific policy regime of corporatist negotiations and Rechtsstaat instruments deflected QA as a ‘hard’ NPM-policy. QA has nevertheless been instrumental within a wider NPM-inspired policy mix for achieving new ways of governmental control of universities and managerialist control within universities. We conclude by arguing that an important function of QA has been to provide ‘legitimacy through procedures.

UR - http://http;//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.07.004

U2 - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 189

EP - 198

JO - Policy and Society

JF - Policy and Society

SN - 1449-4035

ER -