The distinctiveness principle

identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity

Vivian L. Vignoles, Xenia Chryssochoou, Glynis M. Breakwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

175 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-354
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Review
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2000

Fingerprint

cultural system
Group

Cite this

The distinctiveness principle : identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity. / Vignoles, Vivian L.; Chryssochoou, Xenia; Breakwell, Glynis M.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, 11.2000, p. 337-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a547cb284fd44459d185cf544d91856,
title = "The distinctiveness principle: identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity",
abstract = "Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.",
author = "Vignoles, {Vivian L.} and Xenia Chryssochoou and Breakwell, {Glynis M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_4",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "337--354",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The distinctiveness principle

T2 - identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity

AU - Vignoles, Vivian L.

AU - Chryssochoou, Xenia

AU - Breakwell, Glynis M.

PY - 2000/11

Y1 - 2000/11

N2 - Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.

AB - Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_4

U2 - 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_4

DO - 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_4

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 337

EP - 354

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review

IS - 4

ER -