The distinctiveness principle: identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity

Vivian L. Vignoles, Xenia Chryssochoou, Glynis M. Breakwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

207 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-354
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Review
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The distinctiveness principle: identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this