The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions

Pedro Pineda, Isabel Steinhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Through co-occurrence analysis of 1139 documents (1964–2018) we identified discussions about the implementation of student teaching evaluation (SET). We found that: (1) Attention to SET originated in the US in the 1970s, spreading to German-speaking countries in the mid-1990s and continuing in China and Latin America in the early 2000s. (2) SET is commonly viewed as a control tool deserving methodological improvement, while bias is debated in the US. We also found local trajectories: (3) Whereas in the US and Latin America SET is primarily seen as a management tool, German-speaking and Chinese authors reflect more on improving teaching. Chinese scholars consider SET a valid instrument for state control associated with artificial intelligence. Also, (4) SET is commonly used in medical education in the US and the German-speaking region and in physical education in China. We conclude that SET is discussed cross-nationally but affected by regional path dependencies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTeaching in Higher Education
Volume51
Issue number1
Early online date28 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Dec 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this