The David and Goliath Principle

Cultural, Ideological, and Attitudinal Underpinnings of the Normative Protection of Low-Status Groups From Criticism

Carla H. Jeffries, Matthew J. Hornsey, Robbie M. Sutton, Karen M. Douglas, Paul G. Bain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies documented the "David and Goliath" rule-the tendency for people to perceive criticism of "David" groups (groups with low power and status) as less normatively permissible than criticism of "Goliath" groups (groups with high power and status). The authors confirmed the existence of the David and Goliath rule across Western and Chinese cultures (Study 1). However, the rule was endorsed more strongly in Western than in Chinese cultures, an effect mediated by cultural differences in power distance. Study 2 identified the psychological underpinnings of this rule in an Australian sample. Lower social dominance orientation (SDO) was associated with greater endorsement of the rule, an effect mediated through the differential attribution of stereotypes. Specifically, those low in SDO were more likely to attribute traits of warmth and incompetence to David versus Goliath groups, a pattern of stereotypes that was related to the protection of David groups from criticism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1053-1065
Number of pages13
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume38
Issue number8
Early online date26 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jul 2012

Keywords

  • criticism
  • culture
  • power distance
  • social dominance ideology
  • stereotypes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The David and Goliath Principle : Cultural, Ideological, and Attitudinal Underpinnings of the Normative Protection of Low-Status Groups From Criticism. / Jeffries, Carla H.; Hornsey, Matthew J.; Sutton, Robbie M.; Douglas, Karen M.; Bain, Paul G.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 8, 27.07.2012, p. 1053-1065.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b51f6e47318b48b9b50481b7f9d9f609,
title = "The David and Goliath Principle: Cultural, Ideological, and Attitudinal Underpinnings of the Normative Protection of Low-Status Groups From Criticism",
abstract = "Two studies documented the {"}David and Goliath{"} rule-the tendency for people to perceive criticism of {"}David{"} groups (groups with low power and status) as less normatively permissible than criticism of {"}Goliath{"} groups (groups with high power and status). The authors confirmed the existence of the David and Goliath rule across Western and Chinese cultures (Study 1). However, the rule was endorsed more strongly in Western than in Chinese cultures, an effect mediated by cultural differences in power distance. Study 2 identified the psychological underpinnings of this rule in an Australian sample. Lower social dominance orientation (SDO) was associated with greater endorsement of the rule, an effect mediated through the differential attribution of stereotypes. Specifically, those low in SDO were more likely to attribute traits of warmth and incompetence to David versus Goliath groups, a pattern of stereotypes that was related to the protection of David groups from criticism.",
keywords = "criticism, culture, power distance, social dominance ideology, stereotypes",
author = "Jeffries, {Carla H.} and Hornsey, {Matthew J.} and Sutton, {Robbie M.} and Douglas, {Karen M.} and Bain, {Paul G.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/0146167212444454",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1053--1065",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The David and Goliath Principle

T2 - Cultural, Ideological, and Attitudinal Underpinnings of the Normative Protection of Low-Status Groups From Criticism

AU - Jeffries, Carla H.

AU - Hornsey, Matthew J.

AU - Sutton, Robbie M.

AU - Douglas, Karen M.

AU - Bain, Paul G.

PY - 2012/7/27

Y1 - 2012/7/27

N2 - Two studies documented the "David and Goliath" rule-the tendency for people to perceive criticism of "David" groups (groups with low power and status) as less normatively permissible than criticism of "Goliath" groups (groups with high power and status). The authors confirmed the existence of the David and Goliath rule across Western and Chinese cultures (Study 1). However, the rule was endorsed more strongly in Western than in Chinese cultures, an effect mediated by cultural differences in power distance. Study 2 identified the psychological underpinnings of this rule in an Australian sample. Lower social dominance orientation (SDO) was associated with greater endorsement of the rule, an effect mediated through the differential attribution of stereotypes. Specifically, those low in SDO were more likely to attribute traits of warmth and incompetence to David versus Goliath groups, a pattern of stereotypes that was related to the protection of David groups from criticism.

AB - Two studies documented the "David and Goliath" rule-the tendency for people to perceive criticism of "David" groups (groups with low power and status) as less normatively permissible than criticism of "Goliath" groups (groups with high power and status). The authors confirmed the existence of the David and Goliath rule across Western and Chinese cultures (Study 1). However, the rule was endorsed more strongly in Western than in Chinese cultures, an effect mediated by cultural differences in power distance. Study 2 identified the psychological underpinnings of this rule in an Australian sample. Lower social dominance orientation (SDO) was associated with greater endorsement of the rule, an effect mediated through the differential attribution of stereotypes. Specifically, those low in SDO were more likely to attribute traits of warmth and incompetence to David versus Goliath groups, a pattern of stereotypes that was related to the protection of David groups from criticism.

KW - criticism

KW - culture

KW - power distance

KW - social dominance ideology

KW - stereotypes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864145391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167212444454

DO - 10.1177/0146167212444454

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1053

EP - 1065

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 8

ER -