TY - JOUR
T1 - The ‘dark side’ of personal values
T2 - relations to clinical constructs and their implications
AU - Hanel, Paul H. P.
AU - Wolfradt, Uwe
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - Personal values are considered as guiding principles in one's life. Much of previous research on values hasconsequently focused on its relations with variables that are considered positive, including subjective well-being, personality traits, or behavior (e.g. health-related). However, in this study (N = 366) the negative‘dark’ side of values is examined. Specifically, the study investigated the relations between Schwartz' (1992)ten value types and four different clinical variables — anxiety, depression, stress, and schizotypy with its subdimensions, unusual experience, cognitive disorganization, introverted anhedonia, and impulsive nonconfor-mity. Positive relations between achievement and depression and stress, and negative relations between anxiety and hedonism and stimulation were predicted and found. Multiple regressions revealed that the ten value typesexplained the most variance in impulsive nonconformity and the least variance in unusual experience. Overall,values were better in predicting more cognitive clinical variables (e.g., cognitive disorganization) whereas clinical constructs were better in predicting more affective values (e.g., hedonism). Implications of the findings for value research are discussed.
AB - Personal values are considered as guiding principles in one's life. Much of previous research on values hasconsequently focused on its relations with variables that are considered positive, including subjective well-being, personality traits, or behavior (e.g. health-related). However, in this study (N = 366) the negative‘dark’ side of values is examined. Specifically, the study investigated the relations between Schwartz' (1992)ten value types and four different clinical variables — anxiety, depression, stress, and schizotypy with its subdimensions, unusual experience, cognitive disorganization, introverted anhedonia, and impulsive nonconfor-mity. Positive relations between achievement and depression and stress, and negative relations between anxiety and hedonism and stimulation were predicted and found. Multiple regressions revealed that the ten value typesexplained the most variance in impulsive nonconformity and the least variance in unusual experience. Overall,values were better in predicting more cognitive clinical variables (e.g., cognitive disorganization) whereas clinical constructs were better in predicting more affective values (e.g., hedonism). Implications of the findings for value research are discussed.
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.045
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.045
U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.045
DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.045
M3 - Article
SN - 0191-8869
VL - 97
SP - 140
EP - 145
JO - Personality and Individual Differences
JF - Personality and Individual Differences
ER -