The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis

S. Glyn-Jones, P. McLardy-Smith, H. S. Gill, D. W. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The creep and wear behaviour of highly cross-linked polyethylene and standard polyethylene liners were examined in a prospective, double-blind randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. We randomised 54 patients to receive hip replacements with either highly cross-linked polyethylene or standard liners and determined the three-dimensional penetration of the liners over three years. After three years the mean total penetration was 0.35 mm (SD 0.14) for the highly cross-linked polyethylene group and 0.45 mm (SD 0.19) for the standard group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0184). From the pattern of penetration it was possible to discriminate creep from wear. Most (95%) of the creep occurred within six months of implantation and nearly all within the first year. There was no difference in the mean degree of creep between the two types of polyethylene (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.26 mm, SD 0.17; standard 0.27 mm, SD 0.2; p = 0.83). There was, however, a significant difference (p = 0.012) in the mean wear rate (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.03 mm/yr, SD 0.06; standard 0.07 mm/yr, SD 0.05). Creep and wear occurred in significantly different directions (p = 0.01); creep was predominantly proximal whereas wear was anterior, proximal and medial. We conclude that penetration in the first six months is creep-dominated, but after one year virtually all penetration is due to wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has a 60% lower rate of wear than standard polyethylene and therefore will probably perform better in the long term.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-561
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
Volume90
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Radiostereometric Analysis
Polyethylene
Randomized Controlled Trials
Hip

Cite this

The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. / Glyn-Jones, S.; McLardy-Smith, P.; Gill, H. S.; Murray, D. W.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol. 90, No. 5, 2008, p. 556-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35ad1d45bf134e0791d987d6b24ef343,
title = "The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis",
abstract = "The creep and wear behaviour of highly cross-linked polyethylene and standard polyethylene liners were examined in a prospective, double-blind randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. We randomised 54 patients to receive hip replacements with either highly cross-linked polyethylene or standard liners and determined the three-dimensional penetration of the liners over three years. After three years the mean total penetration was 0.35 mm (SD 0.14) for the highly cross-linked polyethylene group and 0.45 mm (SD 0.19) for the standard group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0184). From the pattern of penetration it was possible to discriminate creep from wear. Most (95{\%}) of the creep occurred within six months of implantation and nearly all within the first year. There was no difference in the mean degree of creep between the two types of polyethylene (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.26 mm, SD 0.17; standard 0.27 mm, SD 0.2; p = 0.83). There was, however, a significant difference (p = 0.012) in the mean wear rate (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.03 mm/yr, SD 0.06; standard 0.07 mm/yr, SD 0.05). Creep and wear occurred in significantly different directions (p = 0.01); creep was predominantly proximal whereas wear was anterior, proximal and medial. We conclude that penetration in the first six months is creep-dominated, but after one year virtually all penetration is due to wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has a 60{\%} lower rate of wear than standard polyethylene and therefore will probably perform better in the long term.",
author = "S. Glyn-Jones and P. McLardy-Smith and Gill, {H. S.} and Murray, {D. W.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20545",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "556--561",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume",
issn = "0301-620X",
publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis

AU - Glyn-Jones, S.

AU - McLardy-Smith, P.

AU - Gill, H. S.

AU - Murray, D. W.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The creep and wear behaviour of highly cross-linked polyethylene and standard polyethylene liners were examined in a prospective, double-blind randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. We randomised 54 patients to receive hip replacements with either highly cross-linked polyethylene or standard liners and determined the three-dimensional penetration of the liners over three years. After three years the mean total penetration was 0.35 mm (SD 0.14) for the highly cross-linked polyethylene group and 0.45 mm (SD 0.19) for the standard group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0184). From the pattern of penetration it was possible to discriminate creep from wear. Most (95%) of the creep occurred within six months of implantation and nearly all within the first year. There was no difference in the mean degree of creep between the two types of polyethylene (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.26 mm, SD 0.17; standard 0.27 mm, SD 0.2; p = 0.83). There was, however, a significant difference (p = 0.012) in the mean wear rate (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.03 mm/yr, SD 0.06; standard 0.07 mm/yr, SD 0.05). Creep and wear occurred in significantly different directions (p = 0.01); creep was predominantly proximal whereas wear was anterior, proximal and medial. We conclude that penetration in the first six months is creep-dominated, but after one year virtually all penetration is due to wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has a 60% lower rate of wear than standard polyethylene and therefore will probably perform better in the long term.

AB - The creep and wear behaviour of highly cross-linked polyethylene and standard polyethylene liners were examined in a prospective, double-blind randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. We randomised 54 patients to receive hip replacements with either highly cross-linked polyethylene or standard liners and determined the three-dimensional penetration of the liners over three years. After three years the mean total penetration was 0.35 mm (SD 0.14) for the highly cross-linked polyethylene group and 0.45 mm (SD 0.19) for the standard group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0184). From the pattern of penetration it was possible to discriminate creep from wear. Most (95%) of the creep occurred within six months of implantation and nearly all within the first year. There was no difference in the mean degree of creep between the two types of polyethylene (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.26 mm, SD 0.17; standard 0.27 mm, SD 0.2; p = 0.83). There was, however, a significant difference (p = 0.012) in the mean wear rate (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.03 mm/yr, SD 0.06; standard 0.07 mm/yr, SD 0.05). Creep and wear occurred in significantly different directions (p = 0.01); creep was predominantly proximal whereas wear was anterior, proximal and medial. We conclude that penetration in the first six months is creep-dominated, but after one year virtually all penetration is due to wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has a 60% lower rate of wear than standard polyethylene and therefore will probably perform better in the long term.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43649089638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18450618

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20545

U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20545

DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20545

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 556

EP - 561

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

SN - 0301-620X

IS - 5

ER -