The Changing Nature of Reserve Cohesion: A Study of Future Reserves 2020 and British Army Reserve Logistic Units

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For too long military cohesion scholars have focused on regular infantry forces. This article examines the impact of the Future Reserves 2020 (FR20) policy on cohesion, professionalism, and discipline among British reserve logisticians. In doing so, it makes three significant contributions to the cohesion literature. Firstly, addressing scholars’ almost exclusive focus on regular infantry, it presents the first academic study on cohesion in British reserve logistics forces. Secondly, in detailing how cohesion in these forces is based on interpersonal rather than professional bonds, it argues that the locus of cohesion and discipline in these forces is different to that recently identified in the regular professional infantry. Thirdly, the article argues that while FR20 is gradually changing many of British reserve norms, the organizational realities of reserve service continue to limit the policy's impact. The evidence presented may be theoretically applicable to other reserve and noncombat forces in future cohesion research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-332
Number of pages23
JournalArmed Forces and Society
Volume45
Issue number2
Early online date25 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

group cohesion
military
Logistics
logistics
studies (academic)
Military
evidence

Cite this

The Changing Nature of Reserve Cohesion : A Study of Future Reserves 2020 and British Army Reserve Logistic Units. / Bury, Patrick.

In: Armed Forces and Society, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 310-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b7181f7e3d24018a66f631e30f4ac9d,
title = "The Changing Nature of Reserve Cohesion: A Study of Future Reserves 2020 and British Army Reserve Logistic Units",
abstract = "For too long military cohesion scholars have focused on regular infantry forces. This article examines the impact of the Future Reserves 2020 (FR20) policy on cohesion, professionalism, and discipline among British reserve logisticians. In doing so, it makes three significant contributions to the cohesion literature. Firstly, addressing scholars’ almost exclusive focus on regular infantry, it presents the first academic study on cohesion in British reserve logistics forces. Secondly, in detailing how cohesion in these forces is based on interpersonal rather than professional bonds, it argues that the locus of cohesion and discipline in these forces is different to that recently identified in the regular professional infantry. Thirdly, the article argues that while FR20 is gradually changing many of British reserve norms, the organizational realities of reserve service continue to limit the policy's impact. The evidence presented may be theoretically applicable to other reserve and noncombat forces in future cohesion research.",
author = "Patrick Bury",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0095327X17728917",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "310--332",
journal = "Armed Forces and Society",
issn = "0095-327X",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Changing Nature of Reserve Cohesion

T2 - A Study of Future Reserves 2020 and British Army Reserve Logistic Units

AU - Bury, Patrick

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - For too long military cohesion scholars have focused on regular infantry forces. This article examines the impact of the Future Reserves 2020 (FR20) policy on cohesion, professionalism, and discipline among British reserve logisticians. In doing so, it makes three significant contributions to the cohesion literature. Firstly, addressing scholars’ almost exclusive focus on regular infantry, it presents the first academic study on cohesion in British reserve logistics forces. Secondly, in detailing how cohesion in these forces is based on interpersonal rather than professional bonds, it argues that the locus of cohesion and discipline in these forces is different to that recently identified in the regular professional infantry. Thirdly, the article argues that while FR20 is gradually changing many of British reserve norms, the organizational realities of reserve service continue to limit the policy's impact. The evidence presented may be theoretically applicable to other reserve and noncombat forces in future cohesion research.

AB - For too long military cohesion scholars have focused on regular infantry forces. This article examines the impact of the Future Reserves 2020 (FR20) policy on cohesion, professionalism, and discipline among British reserve logisticians. In doing so, it makes three significant contributions to the cohesion literature. Firstly, addressing scholars’ almost exclusive focus on regular infantry, it presents the first academic study on cohesion in British reserve logistics forces. Secondly, in detailing how cohesion in these forces is based on interpersonal rather than professional bonds, it argues that the locus of cohesion and discipline in these forces is different to that recently identified in the regular professional infantry. Thirdly, the article argues that while FR20 is gradually changing many of British reserve norms, the organizational realities of reserve service continue to limit the policy's impact. The evidence presented may be theoretically applicable to other reserve and noncombat forces in future cohesion research.

U2 - 10.1177/0095327X17728917

DO - 10.1177/0095327X17728917

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 310

EP - 332

JO - Armed Forces and Society

JF - Armed Forces and Society

SN - 0095-327X

IS - 2

ER -