The case for critical realist discourse analysis as a viable method in discursive work

S C E Riley, W Sims-Schouten, C Willig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this reply to Speer's response to our paper we argue that in presenting our method for doing critical realist discourse analysis (CRDA) our paper provided a systematic method from which to do CRDA that was timely, rigorous and significantly different from conversation analysis (CA) in its examination of material practices. We note that our paper addressed a methodological, not epistemological, issue and make a call for a commitment within the discourse analytic community to a valuing of the breadth of methods and approaches in discursive work. We recognize the importance of CA, but also the various versions of discourse analysis that are used in psychology which draw on techniques used in CA, but are not tied to the CA epistemology. These approaches examine normative patterns of language as at least in part a reflection of social relations of power in a given social economic and political/historical context. We conclude by arguing that diversity in research methods is essential. From this perspective, then, CA has an important role to play within discursive psychology, but so do other forms of discursive work, including the CRDA method that we offered in our paper.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-145
Number of pages9
JournalTheory & Psychology
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Psychology
Language
Economics
Conversation Analysis
Discursive
Discourse Analysis
Realist
Research
Social Relations
Discursive Psychology
Epistemological
Research Methods
Discourse
Epistemology
Historical Context
Power (Psychology)

Cite this

The case for critical realist discourse analysis as a viable method in discursive work. / Riley, S C E; Sims-Schouten, W; Willig, C.

In: Theory & Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2007, p. 137-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riley, S C E ; Sims-Schouten, W ; Willig, C. / The case for critical realist discourse analysis as a viable method in discursive work. In: Theory & Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 137-145.
@article{4651201529d04db4832ebcf3fd3a83e4,
title = "The case for critical realist discourse analysis as a viable method in discursive work",
abstract = "In this reply to Speer's response to our paper we argue that in presenting our method for doing critical realist discourse analysis (CRDA) our paper provided a systematic method from which to do CRDA that was timely, rigorous and significantly different from conversation analysis (CA) in its examination of material practices. We note that our paper addressed a methodological, not epistemological, issue and make a call for a commitment within the discourse analytic community to a valuing of the breadth of methods and approaches in discursive work. We recognize the importance of CA, but also the various versions of discourse analysis that are used in psychology which draw on techniques used in CA, but are not tied to the CA epistemology. These approaches examine normative patterns of language as at least in part a reflection of social relations of power in a given social economic and political/historical context. We conclude by arguing that diversity in research methods is essential. From this perspective, then, CA has an important role to play within discursive psychology, but so do other forms of discursive work, including the CRDA method that we offered in our paper.",
author = "Riley, {S C E} and W Sims-Schouten and C Willig",
note = "ID number: ISI:000246554300007",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1177/0959354307073156",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "137--145",
journal = "Theory & Psychology",
issn = "0959-3543",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The case for critical realist discourse analysis as a viable method in discursive work

AU - Riley, S C E

AU - Sims-Schouten, W

AU - Willig, C

N1 - ID number: ISI:000246554300007

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In this reply to Speer's response to our paper we argue that in presenting our method for doing critical realist discourse analysis (CRDA) our paper provided a systematic method from which to do CRDA that was timely, rigorous and significantly different from conversation analysis (CA) in its examination of material practices. We note that our paper addressed a methodological, not epistemological, issue and make a call for a commitment within the discourse analytic community to a valuing of the breadth of methods and approaches in discursive work. We recognize the importance of CA, but also the various versions of discourse analysis that are used in psychology which draw on techniques used in CA, but are not tied to the CA epistemology. These approaches examine normative patterns of language as at least in part a reflection of social relations of power in a given social economic and political/historical context. We conclude by arguing that diversity in research methods is essential. From this perspective, then, CA has an important role to play within discursive psychology, but so do other forms of discursive work, including the CRDA method that we offered in our paper.

AB - In this reply to Speer's response to our paper we argue that in presenting our method for doing critical realist discourse analysis (CRDA) our paper provided a systematic method from which to do CRDA that was timely, rigorous and significantly different from conversation analysis (CA) in its examination of material practices. We note that our paper addressed a methodological, not epistemological, issue and make a call for a commitment within the discourse analytic community to a valuing of the breadth of methods and approaches in discursive work. We recognize the importance of CA, but also the various versions of discourse analysis that are used in psychology which draw on techniques used in CA, but are not tied to the CA epistemology. These approaches examine normative patterns of language as at least in part a reflection of social relations of power in a given social economic and political/historical context. We conclude by arguing that diversity in research methods is essential. From this perspective, then, CA has an important role to play within discursive psychology, but so do other forms of discursive work, including the CRDA method that we offered in our paper.

U2 - 10.1177/0959354307073156

DO - 10.1177/0959354307073156

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 137

EP - 145

JO - Theory & Psychology

JF - Theory & Psychology

SN - 0959-3543

IS - 1

ER -