Abstract
We consider nonadaptive group testing with Bernoulli tests, where each item is placed in each test independently with some fixed probability. We give a tight threshold on the maximum number of tests required to find the defective set under optimal Bernoulli testing. Achievability is given by a result of Scarlett and Cevher; here we give a converse bound showing that this result is best possible. Our new converse requires three parts: a typicality bound generalising the trivial counting bound, a converse on the COMP algorithm of Chan et al, and a bound on the SSS algorithm similar to that given by Aldridge, Baldassini, and Johnson. Our result has a number of important corollaries, in particular that, in denser cases, Bernoulli nonadaptive group testing is strictly worse than the best adaptive strategies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 7142-7148 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Information Theory |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Early online date | 4 Sept 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2017 |
Keywords
- Capacity planning
- Detection algorithms
- Electronic mail
- Entropy
- Error probability
- Testing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Information Systems
- Computer Science Applications
- Library and Information Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Capacity of Bernoulli Nonadaptive Group Testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS