Abstract
One of the most discussed issues in the design community is the performance gap. In this research, we investigate for the first time whether part of the gap might be caused by the modelling literacy of design teams. A total of 108 building modellers were asked to comment on the importance of obtaining and using accurate values for 21 common modelling input variables, from U-values to occupancy schedules when using dynamic simulation to estimate annual energy demand. The questioning was based on a real building for which high-resolution energy, occupancy and temperature data were recorded. A sensitivity analysis was then conducted using a model of the building (based on the measured data) by perturbing one parameter in each simulation. The effect of each perturbation on the annual energy consumption given by the model was found and a ranked list generated. The order of this list was then compared to that given by the modellers for the same changes in the parameters. A correlation analysis indicated little correlation between which variables were thought to be important by the modellers and which proved to be objectively important. k-means cluster analysis identified subgroups of modellers and showed that 25% of the people tested were making judgements that appeared worse than a person responding at random. Follow-up checks showed that higher level qualifications, or having many years of experience in modelling, did not improve the accuracy of people’s predictions. In addition, there was no correlation between modellers, with many ranking some parameters as important that others thought irrelevant. Using a three-part definition of literacy, it is concluded that this sample of modellers, and by implication the population of building modellers, cannot be considered modelling literate. This indicates a new cause of the performance gap. The results suggest a need and an opportunity for both industry and universities to increase their efforts with respect to building physics education, and if this is done, a part of the performance gap could be rapidly closed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 351-375 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Building Services Engineering Research and Technology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 18 Jan 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The building performance gap: Are modellers literate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 2 Finished
-
COLBE - The Creation of Localized Current and Future Weather for the Built Environment
Coley, D. (PI), Budd, C. (CoI), McCullen, N. (CoI) & Natarajan, S. (CoI)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
1/09/15 → 31/08/19
Project: Research council
-
Energy Literacy through an Intelligent Home Energy Advisor ENLITEN
Coley, D. (PI), Brown, M. (CoI), Hourizi, R. (CoI), Jones, S. (CoI), Li, F. (CoI), Natarajan, S. (CoI), O'Neill, E. (CoI), Padget, J. (CoI), Verplanken, B. (CoI) & Walker, I. (CoI)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
8/10/12 → 16/12/16
Project: Research council
Profiles
Datasets
-
The building performance gap: Are modellers literate?
Coley, D. (Creator) & Imam, S. (Creator), University of Bath, 2016
DOI: 10.15125/BATH-00221
Dataset
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS