The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults

Mitchell J. Callan, John H. Ellard, Jennifer E. Nicol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deciding that negative experiences are punishment for prior misdeeds, even when plausible causal links are missing, is immanent justice (IJ) reasoning (Piaget, 1932/1965). Three studies examined a just world theory analysis of IJ reasoning in adults (Lerner, 1980). Studies 1 and 2 varied the valence of a target person's behavior prior to them experiencing an unrelated negative (car accident, Study 1) or positive (lottery win, Study 2) outcome. Participants viewed the outcomes as the result of prior behavior most when they fit deservingness expectations (good person won the lottery, bad person injured in automobile accident), suggesting that just world concerns influenced IJ reasoning. The lottery-winning finding (Study 2) also extends IJ reasoning to positive experiences. A third study found that a manipulation of just world threat in one context (prolonged or ended suffering of an HIV victim) influenced IJ responses in a subsequent unrelated context (automobile accident scenario).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1646-1658
Number of pages13
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume32
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Accidents
Automobiles
Punishment
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
HIV

Keywords

  • Belief in a just world
  • Deservingness
  • Immanent justice
  • Justice motivation
  • Moral reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. / Callan, Mitchell J.; Ellard, John H.; Nicol, Jennifer E.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 12, 12.2006, p. 1646-1658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callan, Mitchell J. ; Ellard, John H. ; Nicol, Jennifer E. / The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 12. pp. 1646-1658.
@article{979dd9487ca84ecf91b54b3eb0a742ee,
title = "The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults",
abstract = "Deciding that negative experiences are punishment for prior misdeeds, even when plausible causal links are missing, is immanent justice (IJ) reasoning (Piaget, 1932/1965). Three studies examined a just world theory analysis of IJ reasoning in adults (Lerner, 1980). Studies 1 and 2 varied the valence of a target person's behavior prior to them experiencing an unrelated negative (car accident, Study 1) or positive (lottery win, Study 2) outcome. Participants viewed the outcomes as the result of prior behavior most when they fit deservingness expectations (good person won the lottery, bad person injured in automobile accident), suggesting that just world concerns influenced IJ reasoning. The lottery-winning finding (Study 2) also extends IJ reasoning to positive experiences. A third study found that a manipulation of just world threat in one context (prolonged or ended suffering of an HIV victim) influenced IJ responses in a subsequent unrelated context (automobile accident scenario).",
keywords = "Belief in a just world, Deservingness, Immanent justice, Justice motivation, Moral reasoning",
author = "Callan, {Mitchell J.} and Ellard, {John H.} and Nicol, {Jennifer E.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0146167206292236",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1646--1658",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults

AU - Callan, Mitchell J.

AU - Ellard, John H.

AU - Nicol, Jennifer E.

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Deciding that negative experiences are punishment for prior misdeeds, even when plausible causal links are missing, is immanent justice (IJ) reasoning (Piaget, 1932/1965). Three studies examined a just world theory analysis of IJ reasoning in adults (Lerner, 1980). Studies 1 and 2 varied the valence of a target person's behavior prior to them experiencing an unrelated negative (car accident, Study 1) or positive (lottery win, Study 2) outcome. Participants viewed the outcomes as the result of prior behavior most when they fit deservingness expectations (good person won the lottery, bad person injured in automobile accident), suggesting that just world concerns influenced IJ reasoning. The lottery-winning finding (Study 2) also extends IJ reasoning to positive experiences. A third study found that a manipulation of just world threat in one context (prolonged or ended suffering of an HIV victim) influenced IJ responses in a subsequent unrelated context (automobile accident scenario).

AB - Deciding that negative experiences are punishment for prior misdeeds, even when plausible causal links are missing, is immanent justice (IJ) reasoning (Piaget, 1932/1965). Three studies examined a just world theory analysis of IJ reasoning in adults (Lerner, 1980). Studies 1 and 2 varied the valence of a target person's behavior prior to them experiencing an unrelated negative (car accident, Study 1) or positive (lottery win, Study 2) outcome. Participants viewed the outcomes as the result of prior behavior most when they fit deservingness expectations (good person won the lottery, bad person injured in automobile accident), suggesting that just world concerns influenced IJ reasoning. The lottery-winning finding (Study 2) also extends IJ reasoning to positive experiences. A third study found that a manipulation of just world threat in one context (prolonged or ended suffering of an HIV victim) influenced IJ responses in a subsequent unrelated context (automobile accident scenario).

KW - Belief in a just world

KW - Deservingness

KW - Immanent justice

KW - Justice motivation

KW - Moral reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751309150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292236

U2 - 10.1177/0146167206292236

DO - 10.1177/0146167206292236

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1646

EP - 1658

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 12

ER -