The Baltic states as 'small states': negotiating the 'East' by engaging the 'West'

Jeremy W Lamoreaux, David J Galbreath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether by population, territory or economic impact, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are small states. In 1940 and 1944, smallness meant forced incorporation into the Soviet Union. From 1991, the Baltic states sat between two geopolitical spaces: one Russian and one European. After years of occupation, the Baltic states were keen to overcome their size and the dangers that are inherent in being small. Thus, in 2004 Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania returned to Europe and the 'West', a position they had held prior to the Second World War. Membership in the EU and NATO provides both opportunities and constraints, yet organizational membership also allows the Baltic states to pursue geopolitical gamesmanship in the post-Soviet area vis-agrave-vis the Russian Federation. Relying on Baldur Thorhallson's concepts of action capacity and vulnerability, we illustrate how the Baltic states have gone beyond what has been expected of small states in international politics by engaging the 'West' to negotiate with the 'East'.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1 - 14
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Baltic Studies
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Baltic states as 'small states': negotiating the 'East' by engaging the 'West''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this