The Australian Charter of Employment Rights: The missing dimensions

G Standing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Just prior to the 2007 General Election, a group of labour lawyers and economists, broadly sympathetic to the Labor Party, produced a Charter of Employment Rights. This article examines the Charter's proposals and its underlying framework, and suggests significant aspects of work and labour have been omitted. It contends that the Charter would have been improved if it had not retained an artificially stretched definition of workers as employees, in which the only relationship worthy of inclusion in a Charter is that between the direct employer and employee. The framework and language of the Charter convey a paternalistic approach and an outdated focus on industrial labour, while ignoring aspects of the emerging global system of work linked to the concept of occupation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-366
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Industrial Relations
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Charter
Labor
Employees
Economists
Language
Lawyers
Workers
Employers
Inclusion
Elections

Cite this

The Australian Charter of Employment Rights: The missing dimensions. / Standing, G.

In: Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2008, p. 355-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{392ebee7aa144a3e9facca409b897988,
title = "The Australian Charter of Employment Rights: The missing dimensions",
abstract = "Just prior to the 2007 General Election, a group of labour lawyers and economists, broadly sympathetic to the Labor Party, produced a Charter of Employment Rights. This article examines the Charter's proposals and its underlying framework, and suggests significant aspects of work and labour have been omitted. It contends that the Charter would have been improved if it had not retained an artificially stretched definition of workers as employees, in which the only relationship worthy of inclusion in a Charter is that between the direct employer and employee. The framework and language of the Charter convey a paternalistic approach and an outdated focus on industrial labour, while ignoring aspects of the emerging global system of work linked to the concept of occupation.",
author = "G Standing",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/0022185607087908",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "355--366",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0022-1856",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Australian Charter of Employment Rights: The missing dimensions

AU - Standing, G

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Just prior to the 2007 General Election, a group of labour lawyers and economists, broadly sympathetic to the Labor Party, produced a Charter of Employment Rights. This article examines the Charter's proposals and its underlying framework, and suggests significant aspects of work and labour have been omitted. It contends that the Charter would have been improved if it had not retained an artificially stretched definition of workers as employees, in which the only relationship worthy of inclusion in a Charter is that between the direct employer and employee. The framework and language of the Charter convey a paternalistic approach and an outdated focus on industrial labour, while ignoring aspects of the emerging global system of work linked to the concept of occupation.

AB - Just prior to the 2007 General Election, a group of labour lawyers and economists, broadly sympathetic to the Labor Party, produced a Charter of Employment Rights. This article examines the Charter's proposals and its underlying framework, and suggests significant aspects of work and labour have been omitted. It contends that the Charter would have been improved if it had not retained an artificially stretched definition of workers as employees, in which the only relationship worthy of inclusion in a Charter is that between the direct employer and employee. The framework and language of the Charter convey a paternalistic approach and an outdated focus on industrial labour, while ignoring aspects of the emerging global system of work linked to the concept of occupation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149123346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185607087908

U2 - 10.1177/0022185607087908

DO - 10.1177/0022185607087908

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 355

EP - 366

JO - Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0022-1856

IS - 2

ER -