The attentional control of pain: Methodological and theoretical concerns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although it is now well accepted that attention-based cognitive coping strategies are effective in altering pain perception and have potentially useful analgesic qualities, there exists contradiction and equivocation as to the role of various factors in the production of that analgesia. Cioffi (1991) has suggested that the response to this equivocation has been a ‘collective ennui’ on the part of researchers. This article seeks to explore methodological and theoretical reasons for this reigning equivocation and offers some suggestions for moving beyond it. In particular, critical attention is focussed upon four possible sources of variance in experimental pain procedures: the choice of the pain induction procedure, the instructions given, the measures taken and the content of the taught strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-10
Number of pages8
JournalPain
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1995

Fingerprint

Pain
Pain Perception
Analgesia
Analgesics
Research Personnel

Cite this

The attentional control of pain: Methodological and theoretical concerns. / Eccleston, Christopher.

In: Pain, Vol. 63, No. 1, 10.1995, p. 3-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a772852d95d4fe88175e2854c75b55f,
title = "The attentional control of pain: Methodological and theoretical concerns",
abstract = "Although it is now well accepted that attention-based cognitive coping strategies are effective in altering pain perception and have potentially useful analgesic qualities, there exists contradiction and equivocation as to the role of various factors in the production of that analgesia. Cioffi (1991) has suggested that the response to this equivocation has been a ‘collective ennui’ on the part of researchers. This article seeks to explore methodological and theoretical reasons for this reigning equivocation and offers some suggestions for moving beyond it. In particular, critical attention is focussed upon four possible sources of variance in experimental pain procedures: the choice of the pain induction procedure, the instructions given, the measures taken and the content of the taught strategy.",
author = "Christopher Eccleston",
year = "1995",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/0304-3959(95)00093-8",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "3--10",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The attentional control of pain: Methodological and theoretical concerns

AU - Eccleston, Christopher

PY - 1995/10

Y1 - 1995/10

N2 - Although it is now well accepted that attention-based cognitive coping strategies are effective in altering pain perception and have potentially useful analgesic qualities, there exists contradiction and equivocation as to the role of various factors in the production of that analgesia. Cioffi (1991) has suggested that the response to this equivocation has been a ‘collective ennui’ on the part of researchers. This article seeks to explore methodological and theoretical reasons for this reigning equivocation and offers some suggestions for moving beyond it. In particular, critical attention is focussed upon four possible sources of variance in experimental pain procedures: the choice of the pain induction procedure, the instructions given, the measures taken and the content of the taught strategy.

AB - Although it is now well accepted that attention-based cognitive coping strategies are effective in altering pain perception and have potentially useful analgesic qualities, there exists contradiction and equivocation as to the role of various factors in the production of that analgesia. Cioffi (1991) has suggested that the response to this equivocation has been a ‘collective ennui’ on the part of researchers. This article seeks to explore methodological and theoretical reasons for this reigning equivocation and offers some suggestions for moving beyond it. In particular, critical attention is focussed upon four possible sources of variance in experimental pain procedures: the choice of the pain induction procedure, the instructions given, the measures taken and the content of the taught strategy.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00093-8

U2 - 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00093-8

DO - 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00093-8

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 3

EP - 10

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 1

ER -