Abstract
A growing number of states are adopting a feminist foreign policy (FFP). Whilst this change has excited much scholarly attention, the process by which countries decide to adopt FFP remains unclear: How can we explain their journey towards the formal adoption of FFP? What factors created an environment in which these states were willing (and able) to declare their foreign policy feminist? We bring together literature on FFP and foreign policy change to identify the factors that lead to the uptake of FFP. The roles of a favorable domestic context; policy entrepreneurs; a new governing coalition; and the international context for feminism, are highlighted as having clear impact on the decision to adopt FFP. The paper focuses on two different cases: Sweden, which pioneered the idea of FFP until a rollback on its position following domestic elections in 2022, and Chile, which only adopted FFP in 2022.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Politics & Gender |
Early online date | 21 Mar 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Mar 2025 |
Funding
Jennifer Thomson’s contribution to this article was supported by ESRC grant ES/V016407/1
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Economic and Social Research Council | ES/V016407/1 |
Keywords
- change conditions
- Chile
- feminism
- feminist foreign policy
- foreign policy change
- Sweden
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gender Studies
- Sociology and Political Science