The Adoption of Feminist Foreign Policy: The cases of Chile and Sweden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A growing number of states are adopting a feminist foreign policy (FFP). Whilst this change has excited much scholarly attention, the process by which countries decide to adopt FFP remains unclear: How can we explain their journey towards the formal adoption of FFP? What factors created an environment in which these states were willing (and able) to declare their foreign policy feminist? We bring together literature on FFP and foreign policy change to identify the factors that lead to the uptake of FFP. The roles of a favorable domestic context; policy entrepreneurs; a new governing coalition; and the international context for feminism, are highlighted as having clear impact on the decision to adopt FFP. The paper focuses on two different cases: Sweden, which pioneered the idea of FFP until a rollback on its position following domestic elections in 2022, and Chile, which only adopted FFP in 2022.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages23
JournalPolitics & Gender
Early online date21 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2025

Funding

Jennifer Thomson’s contribution to this article was supported by ESRC grant ES/V016407/1

FundersFunder number
Economic and Social Research CouncilES/V016407/1

Keywords

  • change conditions
  • Chile
  • feminism
  • feminist foreign policy
  • foreign policy change
  • Sweden

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Adoption of Feminist Foreign Policy: The cases of Chile and Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this