The acute effects of cannabis, with and without cannabidiol, on attentional bias to cannabis related cues: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study

Daniel Hall, Will Lawn, Shelan Ofori, Katie Trinci, Anya Borissova, Claire Mokrysz, Kat Petrilli, Michael A.P. Bloomfield, Matthew B. Wall, Tom P. Freeman, H. Valerie Curran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (SciVal)

Abstract

Rationale: Attentional bias to drug-related stimuli is hypothesised to contribute towards addiction. However, the acute effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on attentional bias to cannabis cues, the differential response in adults and adolescents, and the moderating effect of cannabidiol (CBD) are unknown. Objectives: Our study investigated (1) the acute effects of vaporised cannabis on attentional bias to cannabis-related images in adults and adolescents and (2) the moderating influences of age and CBD. Methods: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study where three weight-adjusted vaporised cannabis preparations: ‘THC’ (8 mg THC for a 75-kg person), ‘THC + CBD’ (8 mg THC and 24 mg CBD for a 75-kg person) and PLA (matched placebo). Cannabis was administered on 3 separate days to 48 participants, who used cannabis 0.5–3 days/week: 24 adolescents (12 females, aged 16–17) and 24 adults (12 females, aged 26–29). Participants completed a visual probe task with cannabis cues. Our primary outcome was attentional bias to cannabis stimuli, measured using the differential reaction time to a cannabis vs. neutral probe, on 200-ms trials. Results: In contrast to hypotheses, attention was directed away from cannabis cues on placebo, and there was a main effect of the drug (F(2,92) = 3.865, p = 0.024, η2p = 0.077), indicating THC administration eliminated this bias. There was no significant impact of CBD nor an age-by-drug interaction. Conclusions: Acute THC intoxication eliminated attentional bias away from cannabis cues. There was no evidence of differential response in adolescents compared to adults and no evidence that a moderate vaporised dose of CBD altered the impact of cannabis on attentional bias. Trial registration: This study was listed with the US National Library of Medicine and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, URL: Do Adolescents and Adults Differ in Their Acute Response to Cannabis?—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04851392.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1125-1134
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume241
Early online date28 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2024

Funding

This study was funded by the Medical Research Council (HVC and TPF grant number MR/P012728/1).

FundersFunder number
Medical Research CouncilMR/P012728/1

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Attentional bias
  • Cannabis
  • CBD
  • THC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The acute effects of cannabis, with and without cannabidiol, on attentional bias to cannabis related cues: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this