Abstract
Most laboratory experiments studying Tullock contest games find that bids significantly exceed the risk-neutral equilibrium predictions. We test the generalisability of these results by comparing a typical experimental implementation of a contest against the familiar institution of a ticket-based raffle. We find that in the raffle (1) initial bid levels are significantly lower and (2) bids adjust more rapidly towards expected-earnings best responses. We demonstrate the robustness of our results by replicating them across two continents at two university labs with contrasting student profiles.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 405-429 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Theory and Decision |
Volume | 88 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 14 Nov 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2020 |
Keywords
- Experiment
- Learning
- Mechanism equivalence
- Raffle
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Applied Psychology
- Social Sciences(all)
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Computer Science Applications