Abstract
We analyze the impact of nonstationary volatility on the break fraction estimator and associated trend break unit root tests of Harris, Harvey, Leybourne, and Taylor (2009) (HHLT). We show that although HHLT's break fraction estimator retains the same large-sample properties as demonstrated by HHLT for homoskedastic shocks, the limiting null distributions of unit root statistics based around this estimator are not pivotal under nonstationary volatility. A solution to the identified inference problem, which does not require the practitioner to specify a parametric model for volatility, is provided using the wild bootstrap and is shown to perform well in practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 957-991 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | Econometric Theory |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2011 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Testing for unit roots in the presence of a possible break in trend and nonstationary volatility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS