Terrorism and post-traumatic stress disorder: a historical review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Terror is a psychological state. Historically, most studies of terrorism focused on its societal purpose and structural consequences rather than mental health effects. That emphasis began to change shortly before the Sept 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. A vast expansion of research into post-traumatic stress disorder accompanied revisions to the classification of mental health disorders. The effect of terrorist incidents on those people now deemed vulnerable, both directly and indirectly, was actively sought. However, a review of more than 400 research articles (mostly published after Sept 11) on the association between terrorism and mental health reached the largely overlooked conclusion that terrorism is not terrorising—at least not in a way that causes a greater than expected frequency of post-traumatic stress disorder than other traumatic events. This conclusion is surprising given the emphasis on the psychological effects of terrorism in political discourse, media commentary, contemporary culture, and academic inquiry. Authorities might prefer to encourage an interpretation of terrorist incidents that highlights fortitude and courage rather than psychological vulnerability.

LanguageEnglish
Article numberS2215-0366(18)30335-3
Pages61-71
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatusPublished - 16 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Terrorism
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Mental Health
Psychology
September 11 Terrorist Attacks
Research
Mental Disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Terrorism and post-traumatic stress disorder : a historical review. / Durodie, William; Wainwright, David.

In: The Lancet Psychiatry, Vol. 6, No. 1, S2215-0366(18)30335-3, 16.10.2018, p. 61-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a32dbf90e7374f898f814efe728962cb,
title = "Terrorism and post-traumatic stress disorder: a historical review",
abstract = "Terror is a psychological state. Historically, most studies of terrorism focused on its societal purpose and structural consequences rather than mental health effects. That emphasis began to change shortly before the Sept 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. A vast expansion of research into post-traumatic stress disorder accompanied revisions to the classification of mental health disorders. The effect of terrorist incidents on those people now deemed vulnerable, both directly and indirectly, was actively sought. However, a review of more than 400 research articles (mostly published after Sept 11) on the association between terrorism and mental health reached the largely overlooked conclusion that terrorism is not terrorising—at least not in a way that causes a greater than expected frequency of post-traumatic stress disorder than other traumatic events. This conclusion is surprising given the emphasis on the psychological effects of terrorism in political discourse, media commentary, contemporary culture, and academic inquiry. Authorities might prefer to encourage an interpretation of terrorist incidents that highlights fortitude and courage rather than psychological vulnerability.",
author = "William Durodie and David Wainwright",
note = "Completing referencing prior to passing on to two potential co-authors for comment.",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30335-3",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "61--71",
journal = "The Lancet Psychiatry",
issn = "2215-0366",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Terrorism and post-traumatic stress disorder

T2 - The Lancet Psychiatry

AU - Durodie, William

AU - Wainwright, David

N1 - Completing referencing prior to passing on to two potential co-authors for comment.

PY - 2018/10/16

Y1 - 2018/10/16

N2 - Terror is a psychological state. Historically, most studies of terrorism focused on its societal purpose and structural consequences rather than mental health effects. That emphasis began to change shortly before the Sept 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. A vast expansion of research into post-traumatic stress disorder accompanied revisions to the classification of mental health disorders. The effect of terrorist incidents on those people now deemed vulnerable, both directly and indirectly, was actively sought. However, a review of more than 400 research articles (mostly published after Sept 11) on the association between terrorism and mental health reached the largely overlooked conclusion that terrorism is not terrorising—at least not in a way that causes a greater than expected frequency of post-traumatic stress disorder than other traumatic events. This conclusion is surprising given the emphasis on the psychological effects of terrorism in political discourse, media commentary, contemporary culture, and academic inquiry. Authorities might prefer to encourage an interpretation of terrorist incidents that highlights fortitude and courage rather than psychological vulnerability.

AB - Terror is a psychological state. Historically, most studies of terrorism focused on its societal purpose and structural consequences rather than mental health effects. That emphasis began to change shortly before the Sept 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. A vast expansion of research into post-traumatic stress disorder accompanied revisions to the classification of mental health disorders. The effect of terrorist incidents on those people now deemed vulnerable, both directly and indirectly, was actively sought. However, a review of more than 400 research articles (mostly published after Sept 11) on the association between terrorism and mental health reached the largely overlooked conclusion that terrorism is not terrorising—at least not in a way that causes a greater than expected frequency of post-traumatic stress disorder than other traumatic events. This conclusion is surprising given the emphasis on the psychological effects of terrorism in political discourse, media commentary, contemporary culture, and academic inquiry. Authorities might prefer to encourage an interpretation of terrorist incidents that highlights fortitude and courage rather than psychological vulnerability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054869953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30335-3

DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30335-3

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 61

EP - 71

JO - The Lancet Psychiatry

JF - The Lancet Psychiatry

SN - 2215-0366

IS - 1

M1 - S2215-0366(18)30335-3

ER -