Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being

Chris Dawson, Michail Veliziotis, Benjamin Hopkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

This article is concerned with whether employees on temporary contracts in Britain report lower well-being than those on permanent contracts, and whether this relationship is mediated by differences in dimensions of job satisfaction. Previous research has identified a well-being gap between permanent and temporary employees but has not addressed what individual and contract specific characteristics contribute to this observed difference. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey, the article finds that a large proportion of the difference in self-reported well-being between permanent and temporary employees appears to be explained by differences in satisfaction with job security. Other dimensions of job satisfaction are found to be less important. In fact, after controlling for differences in satisfaction with security, the results suggest that temporary employees report higher psychological well-being and life satisfaction. This indicates that an employment contract characterized by a definite duration lowers individual well-being principally through heightened job insecurity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages69-98
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Volume38
Issue number1
Early online date17 Dec 2014
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Job satisfaction
Personnel
Temporary employment
Subjective well-being
Well-being
Employees

Cite this

Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being. / Dawson, Chris; Veliziotis, Michail; Hopkins, Benjamin.

In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 69-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dawson, Chris ; Veliziotis, Michail ; Hopkins, Benjamin. / Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being. In: Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 69-98.
@article{3a0bd30d8f0d4554b6ab9825567adf5b,
title = "Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being",
abstract = "This article is concerned with whether employees on temporary contracts in Britain report lower well-being than those on permanent contracts, and whether this relationship is mediated by differences in dimensions of job satisfaction. Previous research has identified a well-being gap between permanent and temporary employees but has not addressed what individual and contract specific characteristics contribute to this observed difference. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey, the article finds that a large proportion of the difference in self-reported well-being between permanent and temporary employees appears to be explained by differences in satisfaction with job security. Other dimensions of job satisfaction are found to be less important. In fact, after controlling for differences in satisfaction with security, the results suggest that temporary employees report higher psychological well-being and life satisfaction. This indicates that an employment contract characterized by a definite duration lowers individual well-being principally through heightened job insecurity.",
author = "Chris Dawson and Michail Veliziotis and Benjamin Hopkins",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0143831X14559781",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "69--98",
journal = "Economic and Industrial Democracy",
issn = "0143-831X",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being

AU - Dawson, Chris

AU - Veliziotis, Michail

AU - Hopkins, Benjamin

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - This article is concerned with whether employees on temporary contracts in Britain report lower well-being than those on permanent contracts, and whether this relationship is mediated by differences in dimensions of job satisfaction. Previous research has identified a well-being gap between permanent and temporary employees but has not addressed what individual and contract specific characteristics contribute to this observed difference. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey, the article finds that a large proportion of the difference in self-reported well-being between permanent and temporary employees appears to be explained by differences in satisfaction with job security. Other dimensions of job satisfaction are found to be less important. In fact, after controlling for differences in satisfaction with security, the results suggest that temporary employees report higher psychological well-being and life satisfaction. This indicates that an employment contract characterized by a definite duration lowers individual well-being principally through heightened job insecurity.

AB - This article is concerned with whether employees on temporary contracts in Britain report lower well-being than those on permanent contracts, and whether this relationship is mediated by differences in dimensions of job satisfaction. Previous research has identified a well-being gap between permanent and temporary employees but has not addressed what individual and contract specific characteristics contribute to this observed difference. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey, the article finds that a large proportion of the difference in self-reported well-being between permanent and temporary employees appears to be explained by differences in satisfaction with job security. Other dimensions of job satisfaction are found to be less important. In fact, after controlling for differences in satisfaction with security, the results suggest that temporary employees report higher psychological well-being and life satisfaction. This indicates that an employment contract characterized by a definite duration lowers individual well-being principally through heightened job insecurity.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831X14559781 i

U2 - 10.1177/0143831X14559781

DO - 10.1177/0143831X14559781

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 69

EP - 98

JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy

T2 - Economic and Industrial Democracy

JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy

SN - 0143-831X

IS - 1

ER -