Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

We draw mainly on the findings from a 2 year research project centered on an Aviva Premiership Rugby Union team. This study offers deeper and more nuanced empirical and theatrical frames to discuss the merits of technology in sport to inform the practice of both coaching and coach education. High Performance Sport has seen an increasing emphasis on ‘Big Data’ operationalized through multiple technological devices leading to heavily led statistical approaches. Administered with conviction because of the perceived benefits where ‘Big Data’ can deliver ‘better’ knowledge (Boyd & Crawford, 2012). It is suggested that ‘Big Data’ is a progressive force in sport but there are some heightened critical questions that require answering (Millington & Millington, 2015). These topics would include: What is the impact ‘data overload’ can have on sports performance? How do technologies intervene between coaches and player relationships? How is the coaching role changing to accommodate masses of data? The contradictions of using ‘Big Data’ in the sporting workplace. What are the lived implications of ‘Big Data’ from the elite athlete perspective? Results reflect the actions of a technocratic coach who was compelled to interpret and manipulate numeric views of individual and collective performance. This statistically created reality provided a powerful objective mandate to control and regulate players who became fixated with meeting performance indictors shutting down improvisation on the field of play (Williams and Manley, 2014). Through being subjected to endless standardisation and evaluation this created an uncomfortable socio-technological alliance which burdened the players to such an extent that they were left broken. However, after the dismissal of this Head Coach a new dawn was heralded and collective self-esteem was restored through a more humanistic balance between art and science being struck. The combination of findings from this longitudinal project responds to calls to demonstrate both ‘best’ and ‘worst’ practice in regard to analysis in team sports (Passos, Araujo and Volossovitch 2016).
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2017
Event11th ICCE Global Coach Conference - Echo arena, Liverpool, UK United Kingdom
Duration: 31 Jul 20173 Aug 2017
https://www.ljmu.ac.uk/conferences/global-coach-conference

Conference

Conference11th ICCE Global Coach Conference
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityLiverpool
Period31/07/173/08/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Sports
coach
performance
coaching
spontaneity
team sports
dismissal
athlete
self-esteem
research project
elite
workplace
art
science
evaluation
education

Cite this

Williams, S., Manley, A., & Millington, B. (2017). Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport. Paper presented at 11th ICCE Global Coach Conference, Liverpool, UK United Kingdom.

Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport. / Williams, Shaun; Manley, Andrew; Millington, Bradley.

2017. Paper presented at 11th ICCE Global Coach Conference, Liverpool, UK United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Williams, S, Manley, A & Millington, B 2017, 'Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport' Paper presented at 11th ICCE Global Coach Conference, Liverpool, UK United Kingdom, 31/07/17 - 3/08/17, .
Williams S, Manley A, Millington B. Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport. 2017. Paper presented at 11th ICCE Global Coach Conference, Liverpool, UK United Kingdom.
Williams, Shaun ; Manley, Andrew ; Millington, Bradley. / Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport. Paper presented at 11th ICCE Global Coach Conference, Liverpool, UK United Kingdom.
@conference{64e9505a2bbe49e49868fb196007034e,
title = "Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport",
abstract = "We draw mainly on the findings from a 2 year research project centered on an Aviva Premiership Rugby Union team. This study offers deeper and more nuanced empirical and theatrical frames to discuss the merits of technology in sport to inform the practice of both coaching and coach education. High Performance Sport has seen an increasing emphasis on ‘Big Data’ operationalized through multiple technological devices leading to heavily led statistical approaches. Administered with conviction because of the perceived benefits where ‘Big Data’ can deliver ‘better’ knowledge (Boyd & Crawford, 2012). It is suggested that ‘Big Data’ is a progressive force in sport but there are some heightened critical questions that require answering (Millington & Millington, 2015). These topics would include: What is the impact ‘data overload’ can have on sports performance? How do technologies intervene between coaches and player relationships? How is the coaching role changing to accommodate masses of data? The contradictions of using ‘Big Data’ in the sporting workplace. What are the lived implications of ‘Big Data’ from the elite athlete perspective? Results reflect the actions of a technocratic coach who was compelled to interpret and manipulate numeric views of individual and collective performance. This statistically created reality provided a powerful objective mandate to control and regulate players who became fixated with meeting performance indictors shutting down improvisation on the field of play (Williams and Manley, 2014). Through being subjected to endless standardisation and evaluation this created an uncomfortable socio-technological alliance which burdened the players to such an extent that they were left broken. However, after the dismissal of this Head Coach a new dawn was heralded and collective self-esteem was restored through a more humanistic balance between art and science being struck. The combination of findings from this longitudinal project responds to calls to demonstrate both ‘best’ and ‘worst’ practice in regard to analysis in team sports (Passos, Araujo and Volossovitch 2016).",
author = "Shaun Williams and Andrew Manley and Bradley Millington",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "31",
language = "English",
note = "11th ICCE Global Coach Conference ; Conference date: 31-07-2017 Through 03-08-2017",
url = "https://www.ljmu.ac.uk/conferences/global-coach-conference",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Technology and ‘Big Data’ in high performance sport

AU - Williams, Shaun

AU - Manley, Andrew

AU - Millington, Bradley

PY - 2017/8/31

Y1 - 2017/8/31

N2 - We draw mainly on the findings from a 2 year research project centered on an Aviva Premiership Rugby Union team. This study offers deeper and more nuanced empirical and theatrical frames to discuss the merits of technology in sport to inform the practice of both coaching and coach education. High Performance Sport has seen an increasing emphasis on ‘Big Data’ operationalized through multiple technological devices leading to heavily led statistical approaches. Administered with conviction because of the perceived benefits where ‘Big Data’ can deliver ‘better’ knowledge (Boyd & Crawford, 2012). It is suggested that ‘Big Data’ is a progressive force in sport but there are some heightened critical questions that require answering (Millington & Millington, 2015). These topics would include: What is the impact ‘data overload’ can have on sports performance? How do technologies intervene between coaches and player relationships? How is the coaching role changing to accommodate masses of data? The contradictions of using ‘Big Data’ in the sporting workplace. What are the lived implications of ‘Big Data’ from the elite athlete perspective? Results reflect the actions of a technocratic coach who was compelled to interpret and manipulate numeric views of individual and collective performance. This statistically created reality provided a powerful objective mandate to control and regulate players who became fixated with meeting performance indictors shutting down improvisation on the field of play (Williams and Manley, 2014). Through being subjected to endless standardisation and evaluation this created an uncomfortable socio-technological alliance which burdened the players to such an extent that they were left broken. However, after the dismissal of this Head Coach a new dawn was heralded and collective self-esteem was restored through a more humanistic balance between art and science being struck. The combination of findings from this longitudinal project responds to calls to demonstrate both ‘best’ and ‘worst’ practice in regard to analysis in team sports (Passos, Araujo and Volossovitch 2016).

AB - We draw mainly on the findings from a 2 year research project centered on an Aviva Premiership Rugby Union team. This study offers deeper and more nuanced empirical and theatrical frames to discuss the merits of technology in sport to inform the practice of both coaching and coach education. High Performance Sport has seen an increasing emphasis on ‘Big Data’ operationalized through multiple technological devices leading to heavily led statistical approaches. Administered with conviction because of the perceived benefits where ‘Big Data’ can deliver ‘better’ knowledge (Boyd & Crawford, 2012). It is suggested that ‘Big Data’ is a progressive force in sport but there are some heightened critical questions that require answering (Millington & Millington, 2015). These topics would include: What is the impact ‘data overload’ can have on sports performance? How do technologies intervene between coaches and player relationships? How is the coaching role changing to accommodate masses of data? The contradictions of using ‘Big Data’ in the sporting workplace. What are the lived implications of ‘Big Data’ from the elite athlete perspective? Results reflect the actions of a technocratic coach who was compelled to interpret and manipulate numeric views of individual and collective performance. This statistically created reality provided a powerful objective mandate to control and regulate players who became fixated with meeting performance indictors shutting down improvisation on the field of play (Williams and Manley, 2014). Through being subjected to endless standardisation and evaluation this created an uncomfortable socio-technological alliance which burdened the players to such an extent that they were left broken. However, after the dismissal of this Head Coach a new dawn was heralded and collective self-esteem was restored through a more humanistic balance between art and science being struck. The combination of findings from this longitudinal project responds to calls to demonstrate both ‘best’ and ‘worst’ practice in regard to analysis in team sports (Passos, Araujo and Volossovitch 2016).

M3 - Paper

ER -