Abstract
In this paper, we engage with O'Brien's [O'Brien, F.A., 2004. Scenario planning - lessons for practice from teaching and learning. European Journal of Operational Research 152, 709-722] identification of both pitfalls in teaching scenario planning and proposed remedies for these. We consider these remedies in relation to our own experience - based on our practice in both the academic and business arenas - and we highlight further pitfalls and proposed remedies. Finally, we propose the use of "hard" multi-attribute decision analysis as a complement to "soft" scenario planning, in order to allow a more formal method of strategy evaluation against a range of constructed scenarios, This approach is intended to remedy biases that are associated with holistic evaluations - such as lexicographic ranking - where undue attention is paid to particular strategic objectives at the expense of others. From this discussion, we seek to contribute to cumulative refinement of the scenario process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 323-335 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | European Journal of Operational Research |
| Volume | 194 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2009 |
Keywords
- Strategic planning
- Decision making
- Teaching
- Planning
- Formal methods
- Decision theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching scenario planning: lessons from practice in academe and business'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS