Taxation, Pension Schemes and Stakeholder Wealth

Emmanouil Platanakis, Charles Sutcliffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although tax relief on pensions is a controversial area of government
expenditure, this is the first study of the tax effects for a real world defined benefit pension scheme. First, we estimate the tax and national insurance contribution (NIC) effects of the scheme’s change from final salary to career average revalued earnings (CARE) in 2011 on the gross and net wealth of the sponsor, government, and 16 age cohorts of members, deferred pensioners and pensioners. Second, we measure the size of the twelve income tax and NIC payments and reliefs for new members and the sponsor, before and after the rule changes. We find the total subsidy split is roughly 40% income tax subsidy; and 60% NIC subsidy. If lower tax rates in retirement and the risk premium effect of the exempt-exempt-taxed (EET) system are not viewed as a tax subsidy, the tax subsidy to members largely disappears. Any remaining subsidy drops, as a proportion of pension benefits, for high earners; as does that for NICs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-46
Number of pages46
JournalAdvances in Taxation
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 3 Sep 2019

Keywords

  • Pension schemes
  • Taxation
  • National Insurance Contributions
  • Universities Superannuation Scheme
  • Redistribution
  • Rule changes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Taxation, Pension Schemes and Stakeholder Wealth. / Platanakis, Emmanouil; Sutcliffe, Charles.

In: Advances in Taxation, 03.09.2019, p. 1-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d9dcdc1aacb34c1c962e3a43e96a02ea,
title = "Taxation, Pension Schemes and Stakeholder Wealth",
abstract = "Although tax relief on pensions is a controversial area of governmentexpenditure, this is the first study of the tax effects for a real world defined benefit pension scheme. First, we estimate the tax and national insurance contribution (NIC) effects of the scheme’s change from final salary to career average revalued earnings (CARE) in 2011 on the gross and net wealth of the sponsor, government, and 16 age cohorts of members, deferred pensioners and pensioners. Second, we measure the size of the twelve income tax and NIC payments and reliefs for new members and the sponsor, before and after the rule changes. We find the total subsidy split is roughly 40{\%} income tax subsidy; and 60{\%} NIC subsidy. If lower tax rates in retirement and the risk premium effect of the exempt-exempt-taxed (EET) system are not viewed as a tax subsidy, the tax subsidy to members largely disappears. Any remaining subsidy drops, as a proportion of pension benefits, for high earners; as does that for NICs.",
keywords = "Pension schemes, Taxation, National Insurance Contributions, Universities Superannuation Scheme, Redistribution, Rule changes",
author = "Emmanouil Platanakis and Charles Sutcliffe",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "3",
language = "English",
pages = "1--46",
journal = "Advances in Taxation",
issn = "1058-7497",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taxation, Pension Schemes and Stakeholder Wealth

AU - Platanakis, Emmanouil

AU - Sutcliffe, Charles

PY - 2019/9/3

Y1 - 2019/9/3

N2 - Although tax relief on pensions is a controversial area of governmentexpenditure, this is the first study of the tax effects for a real world defined benefit pension scheme. First, we estimate the tax and national insurance contribution (NIC) effects of the scheme’s change from final salary to career average revalued earnings (CARE) in 2011 on the gross and net wealth of the sponsor, government, and 16 age cohorts of members, deferred pensioners and pensioners. Second, we measure the size of the twelve income tax and NIC payments and reliefs for new members and the sponsor, before and after the rule changes. We find the total subsidy split is roughly 40% income tax subsidy; and 60% NIC subsidy. If lower tax rates in retirement and the risk premium effect of the exempt-exempt-taxed (EET) system are not viewed as a tax subsidy, the tax subsidy to members largely disappears. Any remaining subsidy drops, as a proportion of pension benefits, for high earners; as does that for NICs.

AB - Although tax relief on pensions is a controversial area of governmentexpenditure, this is the first study of the tax effects for a real world defined benefit pension scheme. First, we estimate the tax and national insurance contribution (NIC) effects of the scheme’s change from final salary to career average revalued earnings (CARE) in 2011 on the gross and net wealth of the sponsor, government, and 16 age cohorts of members, deferred pensioners and pensioners. Second, we measure the size of the twelve income tax and NIC payments and reliefs for new members and the sponsor, before and after the rule changes. We find the total subsidy split is roughly 40% income tax subsidy; and 60% NIC subsidy. If lower tax rates in retirement and the risk premium effect of the exempt-exempt-taxed (EET) system are not viewed as a tax subsidy, the tax subsidy to members largely disappears. Any remaining subsidy drops, as a proportion of pension benefits, for high earners; as does that for NICs.

KW - Pension schemes

KW - Taxation

KW - National Insurance Contributions

KW - Universities Superannuation Scheme

KW - Redistribution

KW - Rule changes

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 46

JO - Advances in Taxation

JF - Advances in Taxation

SN - 1058-7497

ER -