Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter?

T Blackman, E Elliott, A Greene, B Harrington, D Hunter, L Marks, L McKee, K Smith, G Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 16 Citations

Abstract

Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages762-778
Number of pages17
JournalPublic Administration
Volume87
Issue number4
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

decentralization
performance assessment
health
health behavior
indication
health service
budget
public policy
manager
discourse
trend
interview
evidence

Cite this

Blackman, T., Elliott, E., Greene, A., Harrington, B., Hunter, D., Marks, L., ... Williams, G. (2009). Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter? DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x

Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter? / Blackman, T; Elliott, E; Greene, A; Harrington, B; Hunter, D; Marks, L; McKee, L; Smith, K; Williams, G.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 87, No. 4, 2009, p. 762-778.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blackman, T, Elliott, E, Greene, A, Harrington, B, Hunter, D, Marks, L, McKee, L, Smith, K & Williams, G 2009, 'Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter?' Public Administration, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 762-778. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x
Blackman T, Elliott E, Greene A, Harrington B, Hunter D, Marks L et al. Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter? Public Administration. 2009;87(4):762-778. Available from, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x
Blackman, T ; Elliott, E ; Greene, A ; Harrington, B ; Hunter, D ; Marks, L ; McKee, L ; Smith, K ; Williams, G. / Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter?. In: Public Administration. 2009 ; Vol. 87, No. 4. pp. 762-778
@article{9177017883a844078f5cbae99b12d066,
title = "Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter?",
abstract = "Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.",
author = "T Blackman and E Elliott and A Greene and B Harrington and D Hunter and L Marks and L McKee and K Smith and G Williams",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "762--778",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "1467-9299",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: Do targets matter?

AU - Blackman,T

AU - Elliott,E

AU - Greene,A

AU - Harrington,B

AU - Hunter,D

AU - Marks,L

AU - McKee,L

AU - Smith,K

AU - Williams,G

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.

AB - Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74349090140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 762

EP - 778

JO - Public Administration

T2 - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 1467-9299

IS - 4

ER -