Symbolic Convergence or Divergence? Making Sense of (the Rhetorical) Senses of a University-Wide Organizational Change

Lina Ba, W. G.Will Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This research investigates the extent to which organizational change initiatives may lead to divergent patterns of sensemaking among organizational members. Drawing on the symbolic convergence theory, we performed an in-depth fantasy theme analysis of organization members’ rhetoric around an organizational change at a private university. Our analysis uncovers six fantasy themes and two corresponding fantasy types, which lead to no rhetorical vision. The lack of cognitive convergence between change initiators and change recipients suggests the inherent incompatibility between managerial and employee fantasies around organizational change, barring the exceptions of dual-responsibility change recipients (e.g., faculty members who also assume administrative responsibilities), who tend to adopt the change initiator rhetoric. Overall, this study informs our extant knowledge of change sensemaking with novel theoretical and methodological insights and bears implications for organizational change researchers and practitioners alike.

Original languageEnglish
Article number690757
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • change sensemaking
  • fantasy theme analysis
  • organization members
  • organizational change
  • rhetoric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this