TY - JOUR
T1 - Swiss ball enhances lumbar multifidus activity in chronic low back pain
AU - Scott, I. R.
AU - Vaughan, A. R. S.
AU - Hall, J.
PY - 2015/2
Y1 - 2015/2
N2 - Objectives: This study examined the effects of sitting surfaces on the cross-sectional area of lumbar multifidus (LM) in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and healthy controls (HC). Design: Cross-Sectional Case Controlled Study. Setting: Isle of Man Institute of Sport. Participants: 40 age and sex matched, sporting participants aged 18-45 years, recruited from private physiotherapy practice patients (n = 20 CLBP, 16 male, 4 female, and n = 20 healthy controls, 16 males and 4 females). Main Outcome Measures: Cross-sectional area of LM was measured using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. Results: Swiss Ball (SB) was more effective at stimulating LM than a Stable Surface (SS) in both groups: CLBP:SB:12.3 (cm2) (SD:3.6), SS:10.15 (SD:2.6), p <0.0001; HC:SB:12.5 (SD:2.7), SS:11.3 (SD:2.9), p <0.0001). No significant differences between groups were noted. No differences between left and right side cross-sectional areas between or within groups were noted. Conclusion: Cross-sectional area of LM increased as the lability of the surface increased, demonstrating that SB was more effective at stimulating LM activity than a non-labile surface. This confirms current clinical practice and supports the use of a labile surface in spinal rehabilitation. The lack of LM asymmetry within and between groups is discussed.
AB - Objectives: This study examined the effects of sitting surfaces on the cross-sectional area of lumbar multifidus (LM) in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and healthy controls (HC). Design: Cross-Sectional Case Controlled Study. Setting: Isle of Man Institute of Sport. Participants: 40 age and sex matched, sporting participants aged 18-45 years, recruited from private physiotherapy practice patients (n = 20 CLBP, 16 male, 4 female, and n = 20 healthy controls, 16 males and 4 females). Main Outcome Measures: Cross-sectional area of LM was measured using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. Results: Swiss Ball (SB) was more effective at stimulating LM than a Stable Surface (SS) in both groups: CLBP:SB:12.3 (cm2) (SD:3.6), SS:10.15 (SD:2.6), p <0.0001; HC:SB:12.5 (SD:2.7), SS:11.3 (SD:2.9), p <0.0001). No significant differences between groups were noted. No differences between left and right side cross-sectional areas between or within groups were noted. Conclusion: Cross-sectional area of LM increased as the lability of the surface increased, demonstrating that SB was more effective at stimulating LM activity than a non-labile surface. This confirms current clinical practice and supports the use of a labile surface in spinal rehabilitation. The lack of LM asymmetry within and between groups is discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901384006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.007
U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.007
DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.007
M3 - Article
SN - 1466-853X
VL - 16
SP - 40
EP - 44
JO - Physical Therapy in Sport
JF - Physical Therapy in Sport
IS - 1
ER -