Support with caveats: advocates’ views of the Theory of Formal Discipline as a reason for the study of advanced mathematics

Elaine Wainwright, Nina Attridge, David Wainwright, Lara Alcock, Matthew Inglis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Theory of Formal Discipline (TFD) suggests that studying mathematics improves general thinking skills. Empirical evidence for the TFD is sparse, yet it is cited in policy reports as a justification for the importance of mathematics in school curricula. The study reported in this article investigated the extent to which influential UK advocates for mathematics agree with the TFD and their views on the arguments and evidence that surround it. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from structured interviews revealed four themes: broad endorsement of the TFD; reference to supportive employment data; the possibilities that mathematics education might not always effectively develop reasoning and that study of other subjects might have similar effects; and concerns about causality and the extent of the evidence base. We conclude that advocates broadly support the TFD despite being aware of its limitations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-41
Number of pages22
JournalResearch in Mathematics Education
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date7 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • conditional reasoning
  • logical reasoning
  • mathematics education
  • policy
  • Theory of Formal Discipline (TFD)
  • thinking skills

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Support with caveats: advocates’ views of the Theory of Formal Discipline as a reason for the study of advanced mathematics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this