Support for multiple classes of local expression clusters in Drosophila melanogaster, but no evidence for gene order conservation

Claudia C Weber, Laurence D Hurst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster. In yeasts, the model taxon for gene order analysis, such syntenic clusters of non-homologous genes tend to be conserved over evolutionary time. Whether similar clusters show gene order conservation in other lineages is, however, undecided. Here, we examine this issue in Drosophila melanogaster using high-resolution chromosome rearrangement data.

Results: We show that D. melanogaster has at least three classes of expression clusters: first, as observed in mammals, large clusters of functionally unrelated housekeeping genes; second, small clusters of functionally related highly co-expressed genes; and finally, as previously defined by Spellman and Rubin, larger domains of co-expressed but functionally unrelated genes. The latter are, however, not independent of the small co-expression clusters and likely reflect a methodological artifact. While the small co-expression and housekeeping/essential gene clusters resemble those observed in yeast, in contrast to yeast, we see no evidence that any of the three cluster types are preserved as synteny blocks. If anything, adjacent co-expressed genes are more likely to become rearranged than expected. Again in contrast to yeast, in D. melanogaster, gene pairs with short intergene distance or in divergent orientations tend to have higher rearrangement rates. These findings are consistent with co-expression being partly due to shared chromatin environment.

Conclusions: We conclude that, while similar in terms of cluster types, gene order evolution has strikingly different patterns in yeasts and in D. melanogaster, although recombination is associated with gene order rearrangement in both.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberR23
JournalGenome Biology
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Gene Order
Drosophila melanogaster
Yeasts
gene
Essential Genes
Genes
genes
yeast
yeasts
Synteny
Gene Rearrangement
Multigene Family
Artifacts
Genetic Recombination
Chromatin
Mammals
Chromosomes
Genome
multigene family
chromatin

Cite this

Support for multiple classes of local expression clusters in Drosophila melanogaster, but no evidence for gene order conservation. / Weber, Claudia C; Hurst, Laurence D.

In: Genome Biology, Vol. 12, No. 3, R23, 17.03.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70231e2be67a47379e6a8953b5423d14,
title = "Support for multiple classes of local expression clusters in Drosophila melanogaster, but no evidence for gene order conservation",
abstract = "Background: Gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster. In yeasts, the model taxon for gene order analysis, such syntenic clusters of non-homologous genes tend to be conserved over evolutionary time. Whether similar clusters show gene order conservation in other lineages is, however, undecided. Here, we examine this issue in Drosophila melanogaster using high-resolution chromosome rearrangement data. Results: We show that D. melanogaster has at least three classes of expression clusters: first, as observed in mammals, large clusters of functionally unrelated housekeeping genes; second, small clusters of functionally related highly co-expressed genes; and finally, as previously defined by Spellman and Rubin, larger domains of co-expressed but functionally unrelated genes. The latter are, however, not independent of the small co-expression clusters and likely reflect a methodological artifact. While the small co-expression and housekeeping/essential gene clusters resemble those observed in yeast, in contrast to yeast, we see no evidence that any of the three cluster types are preserved as synteny blocks. If anything, adjacent co-expressed genes are more likely to become rearranged than expected. Again in contrast to yeast, in D. melanogaster, gene pairs with short intergene distance or in divergent orientations tend to have higher rearrangement rates. These findings are consistent with co-expression being partly due to shared chromatin environment. Conclusions: We conclude that, while similar in terms of cluster types, gene order evolution has strikingly different patterns in yeasts and in D. melanogaster, although recombination is associated with gene order rearrangement in both.",
author = "Weber, {Claudia C} and Hurst, {Laurence D}",
note = "The full text is freely available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r23",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r23",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Genome Biology",
issn = "1474-760X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Support for multiple classes of local expression clusters in Drosophila melanogaster, but no evidence for gene order conservation

AU - Weber, Claudia C

AU - Hurst, Laurence D

N1 - The full text is freely available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r23

PY - 2011/3/17

Y1 - 2011/3/17

N2 - Background: Gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster. In yeasts, the model taxon for gene order analysis, such syntenic clusters of non-homologous genes tend to be conserved over evolutionary time. Whether similar clusters show gene order conservation in other lineages is, however, undecided. Here, we examine this issue in Drosophila melanogaster using high-resolution chromosome rearrangement data. Results: We show that D. melanogaster has at least three classes of expression clusters: first, as observed in mammals, large clusters of functionally unrelated housekeeping genes; second, small clusters of functionally related highly co-expressed genes; and finally, as previously defined by Spellman and Rubin, larger domains of co-expressed but functionally unrelated genes. The latter are, however, not independent of the small co-expression clusters and likely reflect a methodological artifact. While the small co-expression and housekeeping/essential gene clusters resemble those observed in yeast, in contrast to yeast, we see no evidence that any of the three cluster types are preserved as synteny blocks. If anything, adjacent co-expressed genes are more likely to become rearranged than expected. Again in contrast to yeast, in D. melanogaster, gene pairs with short intergene distance or in divergent orientations tend to have higher rearrangement rates. These findings are consistent with co-expression being partly due to shared chromatin environment. Conclusions: We conclude that, while similar in terms of cluster types, gene order evolution has strikingly different patterns in yeasts and in D. melanogaster, although recombination is associated with gene order rearrangement in both.

AB - Background: Gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster. In yeasts, the model taxon for gene order analysis, such syntenic clusters of non-homologous genes tend to be conserved over evolutionary time. Whether similar clusters show gene order conservation in other lineages is, however, undecided. Here, we examine this issue in Drosophila melanogaster using high-resolution chromosome rearrangement data. Results: We show that D. melanogaster has at least three classes of expression clusters: first, as observed in mammals, large clusters of functionally unrelated housekeeping genes; second, small clusters of functionally related highly co-expressed genes; and finally, as previously defined by Spellman and Rubin, larger domains of co-expressed but functionally unrelated genes. The latter are, however, not independent of the small co-expression clusters and likely reflect a methodological artifact. While the small co-expression and housekeeping/essential gene clusters resemble those observed in yeast, in contrast to yeast, we see no evidence that any of the three cluster types are preserved as synteny blocks. If anything, adjacent co-expressed genes are more likely to become rearranged than expected. Again in contrast to yeast, in D. melanogaster, gene pairs with short intergene distance or in divergent orientations tend to have higher rearrangement rates. These findings are consistent with co-expression being partly due to shared chromatin environment. Conclusions: We conclude that, while similar in terms of cluster types, gene order evolution has strikingly different patterns in yeasts and in D. melanogaster, although recombination is associated with gene order rearrangement in both.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952698915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129673

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r23

U2 - 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r23

DO - 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r23

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Genome Biology

JF - Genome Biology

SN - 1474-760X

IS - 3

M1 - R23

ER -