Still cognitive after all these years? Perspectives for a cognitive behavioural theory of obsessions and where we are 30 years later - a commentary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
107 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) was historically regarded as untreatable. In 1965 OCD was seen as an intractable and deteriorating condition, with little hope of improvement. It was not understood, but generally regarded as a kind of “pre-psychotic” state, with sufferers permanently at risk of being tipped over that edge. Treatment was confined to long term hospitalisation and psychosurgery, although neither of these held any hope of recovery. Fifty years on, OCD is not only understood as being a result of a range of otherwise normal processes but is also regarded as entirely treatable, with complete recovery being a real possibility. This has come about through the development and evolution of first behavioural then cognitive-behavioural approaches to its understanding and treatment. Objective: In 1993, Clark and Purdon, wrote an important and stimulating paper in Australian Psychologist in which they explored emerging cognitive theory, particularly that set out by Salkovskis (1985). The current paper aims to examine the contribution of the Clark and Purdon paper to the field. We aim to review this in the context of both the status of the field when it was written and subsequent developments. Method & Results: This evaluation is used to consider the current status of cognitive and cognitive behavioural theories. Since 1993 there have been a number of key developments in the field. In our view, these include work that has focused on formulation and development of a shared alternative explanation, the use of safety seeking behaviours, identification of Elevated Evidence Requirements, reassurance seeking and mental contamination. All of which will be reviewed in turn. Conclusion: It is concluded that the Clark and Purdon paper, although incorrect in several key aspects, made an important contribution to the development of a field which continues to evolve in a vibrant and challenging way.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-17
JournalAustralian Psychologist
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Obsessive Behavior
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Hope
Psychosurgery
Reference Values
Hospitalization
Psychology
Safety
Therapeutics
Obsessions
Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

Keywords

  • Cognitive Theory; Cognitive Behavioural Theory; Obsessive Compulsive Disorder; Theory-practice links

Cite this

@article{1080791433064e5ca5859e1b4d60008b,
title = "Still cognitive after all these years? Perspectives for a cognitive behavioural theory of obsessions and where we are 30 years later - a commentary",
abstract = "Background: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) was historically regarded as untreatable. In 1965 OCD was seen as an intractable and deteriorating condition, with little hope of improvement. It was not understood, but generally regarded as a kind of “pre-psychotic” state, with sufferers permanently at risk of being tipped over that edge. Treatment was confined to long term hospitalisation and psychosurgery, although neither of these held any hope of recovery. Fifty years on, OCD is not only understood as being a result of a range of otherwise normal processes but is also regarded as entirely treatable, with complete recovery being a real possibility. This has come about through the development and evolution of first behavioural then cognitive-behavioural approaches to its understanding and treatment. Objective: In 1993, Clark and Purdon, wrote an important and stimulating paper in Australian Psychologist in which they explored emerging cognitive theory, particularly that set out by Salkovskis (1985). The current paper aims to examine the contribution of the Clark and Purdon paper to the field. We aim to review this in the context of both the status of the field when it was written and subsequent developments. Method & Results: This evaluation is used to consider the current status of cognitive and cognitive behavioural theories. Since 1993 there have been a number of key developments in the field. In our view, these include work that has focused on formulation and development of a shared alternative explanation, the use of safety seeking behaviours, identification of Elevated Evidence Requirements, reassurance seeking and mental contamination. All of which will be reviewed in turn. Conclusion: It is concluded that the Clark and Purdon paper, although incorrect in several key aspects, made an important contribution to the development of a field which continues to evolve in a vibrant and challenging way.",
keywords = "Cognitive Theory; Cognitive Behavioural Theory; Obsessive Compulsive Disorder; Theory-practice links",
author = "Paul Salkovskis and Josephine Millar",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/ap.12200",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "14--17",
journal = "Australian Psychologist",
issn = "0005-0067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Still cognitive after all these years? Perspectives for a cognitive behavioural theory of obsessions and where we are 30 years later - a commentary

AU - Salkovskis, Paul

AU - Millar, Josephine

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Background: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) was historically regarded as untreatable. In 1965 OCD was seen as an intractable and deteriorating condition, with little hope of improvement. It was not understood, but generally regarded as a kind of “pre-psychotic” state, with sufferers permanently at risk of being tipped over that edge. Treatment was confined to long term hospitalisation and psychosurgery, although neither of these held any hope of recovery. Fifty years on, OCD is not only understood as being a result of a range of otherwise normal processes but is also regarded as entirely treatable, with complete recovery being a real possibility. This has come about through the development and evolution of first behavioural then cognitive-behavioural approaches to its understanding and treatment. Objective: In 1993, Clark and Purdon, wrote an important and stimulating paper in Australian Psychologist in which they explored emerging cognitive theory, particularly that set out by Salkovskis (1985). The current paper aims to examine the contribution of the Clark and Purdon paper to the field. We aim to review this in the context of both the status of the field when it was written and subsequent developments. Method & Results: This evaluation is used to consider the current status of cognitive and cognitive behavioural theories. Since 1993 there have been a number of key developments in the field. In our view, these include work that has focused on formulation and development of a shared alternative explanation, the use of safety seeking behaviours, identification of Elevated Evidence Requirements, reassurance seeking and mental contamination. All of which will be reviewed in turn. Conclusion: It is concluded that the Clark and Purdon paper, although incorrect in several key aspects, made an important contribution to the development of a field which continues to evolve in a vibrant and challenging way.

AB - Background: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) was historically regarded as untreatable. In 1965 OCD was seen as an intractable and deteriorating condition, with little hope of improvement. It was not understood, but generally regarded as a kind of “pre-psychotic” state, with sufferers permanently at risk of being tipped over that edge. Treatment was confined to long term hospitalisation and psychosurgery, although neither of these held any hope of recovery. Fifty years on, OCD is not only understood as being a result of a range of otherwise normal processes but is also regarded as entirely treatable, with complete recovery being a real possibility. This has come about through the development and evolution of first behavioural then cognitive-behavioural approaches to its understanding and treatment. Objective: In 1993, Clark and Purdon, wrote an important and stimulating paper in Australian Psychologist in which they explored emerging cognitive theory, particularly that set out by Salkovskis (1985). The current paper aims to examine the contribution of the Clark and Purdon paper to the field. We aim to review this in the context of both the status of the field when it was written and subsequent developments. Method & Results: This evaluation is used to consider the current status of cognitive and cognitive behavioural theories. Since 1993 there have been a number of key developments in the field. In our view, these include work that has focused on formulation and development of a shared alternative explanation, the use of safety seeking behaviours, identification of Elevated Evidence Requirements, reassurance seeking and mental contamination. All of which will be reviewed in turn. Conclusion: It is concluded that the Clark and Purdon paper, although incorrect in several key aspects, made an important contribution to the development of a field which continues to evolve in a vibrant and challenging way.

KW - Cognitive Theory; Cognitive Behavioural Theory; Obsessive Compulsive Disorder; Theory-practice links

U2 - 10.1111/ap.12200

DO - 10.1111/ap.12200

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 14

EP - 17

JO - Australian Psychologist

JF - Australian Psychologist

SN - 0005-0067

IS - 1

ER -