Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations

the case of gender and science education

Glynis M. Breakwell, Vivian L. Vignoles, Toby Robertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A sample of UK adolescents (n = 1140), grouped by sex and liking of science, evaluated themselves, and girl and boy targets who did or did not like science, on masculine, feminine and gender non-specific traits. Contrary to sociological concerns about the masculine image and appeal of science, those who liked science more rated themselves more positively on feminine and gender non-specific-but not masculine-traits. The girl target was rated lower on feminine traits if she liked science, but the boy was rated higher on feminine traits if he liked science. Target ratings also showed in-group enhancement based on liking of science, and a 'black sheep' effect: those who liked science less discriminated against the same-sex target who liked science, especially on gender in-group relevant traits. We argue that gender differences in science education should be attributed partly to subjective group dynamics and not solely to images of science.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-455
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume94
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003

Fingerprint

Education

Cite this

Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations : the case of gender and science education. / Breakwell, Glynis M.; Vignoles, Vivian L.; Robertson, Toby.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 4, 11.2003, p. 437-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea52eb7fe0234affbe21ff5b434cf00d,
title = "Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations: the case of gender and science education",
abstract = "A sample of UK adolescents (n = 1140), grouped by sex and liking of science, evaluated themselves, and girl and boy targets who did or did not like science, on masculine, feminine and gender non-specific traits. Contrary to sociological concerns about the masculine image and appeal of science, those who liked science more rated themselves more positively on feminine and gender non-specific-but not masculine-traits. The girl target was rated lower on feminine traits if she liked science, but the boy was rated higher on feminine traits if he liked science. Target ratings also showed in-group enhancement based on liking of science, and a 'black sheep' effect: those who liked science less discriminated against the same-sex target who liked science, especially on gender in-group relevant traits. We argue that gender differences in science education should be attributed partly to subjective group dynamics and not solely to images of science.",
author = "Breakwell, {Glynis M.} and Vignoles, {Vivian L.} and Toby Robertson",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1348/000712603322503024",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "437--455",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations

T2 - the case of gender and science education

AU - Breakwell, Glynis M.

AU - Vignoles, Vivian L.

AU - Robertson, Toby

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - A sample of UK adolescents (n = 1140), grouped by sex and liking of science, evaluated themselves, and girl and boy targets who did or did not like science, on masculine, feminine and gender non-specific traits. Contrary to sociological concerns about the masculine image and appeal of science, those who liked science more rated themselves more positively on feminine and gender non-specific-but not masculine-traits. The girl target was rated lower on feminine traits if she liked science, but the boy was rated higher on feminine traits if he liked science. Target ratings also showed in-group enhancement based on liking of science, and a 'black sheep' effect: those who liked science less discriminated against the same-sex target who liked science, especially on gender in-group relevant traits. We argue that gender differences in science education should be attributed partly to subjective group dynamics and not solely to images of science.

AB - A sample of UK adolescents (n = 1140), grouped by sex and liking of science, evaluated themselves, and girl and boy targets who did or did not like science, on masculine, feminine and gender non-specific traits. Contrary to sociological concerns about the masculine image and appeal of science, those who liked science more rated themselves more positively on feminine and gender non-specific-but not masculine-traits. The girl target was rated lower on feminine traits if she liked science, but the boy was rated higher on feminine traits if he liked science. Target ratings also showed in-group enhancement based on liking of science, and a 'black sheep' effect: those who liked science less discriminated against the same-sex target who liked science, especially on gender in-group relevant traits. We argue that gender differences in science education should be attributed partly to subjective group dynamics and not solely to images of science.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712603322503024

U2 - 10.1348/000712603322503024

DO - 10.1348/000712603322503024

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 437

EP - 455

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 4

ER -