Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Steering Political Conflicts for Climate Stability: The Case of China

  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • Georgetown University

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceedingBook chapter

Abstract

How can the state make durable policies and control resistance of incumbent fossil fuel interests for rapid decarbonization? Through the lens of policy feedback and coalitions, we argue that in certain contexts the state can manage political conflicts to ensure durable policies for decarbonization. We use the case of China – the world’s largest carbon emitter with a political economy system where the state has large influence on the market – to illustrate the possibility of conflict management for energy transition. We show how the central government has used regulatory power to induce big power companies to shift away from fossil fuels toward renewable energies. Reflecting upon the Chinese case, we identify some conditions under which the state can redirect the interest of incumbent actors toward net zero transition. Our study suggests that while political conflicts are inevitable to combat climate change, policymakers can strategically manage them to deepen and accelerate transition.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationStability and Politicization in Climate Governance
EditorsPaul Tobin, Matthew Paterson, Stacy VanDeveer
PublisherCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pages146-162
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9781009352444
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Aug 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Steering Political Conflicts for Climate Stability: The Case of China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this