Statistics Education in Undergraduate Psychology: A Survey of UK Curricula

TARG Meta-Research Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Graduates from psychology programmes are likely to use data skills throughout their career, regardless of whether they continue into research. Statistical education in psychology programmes, however, emphasizes inferential statistical tests over a deep understanding of data and data skills, which can lead to the problematic use and interpretation of statistics. Indeed, widely-used statistical practices appear to undermine the quality of scientific research and mislead end-users of data. Several proposals have been made for how to improve these practices—with effective statistical education being one. With this in mind, we sought to document the statistical content currently taught to undergraduate psychology students in the UK. Contrary to our expectations, we found that only 19% of universities had publicly available curricula describing the statistical content taught in their undergraduate psychology programme. Of the curricula we obtained, most of them mentioned specific tests (ANOVAs, regression, correlation, t-tests, frequency tests, and rank tests) and about half mentioned probability and randomness, effect size, and statistical power, but few mentioned concepts such as confidence intervals, multiple comparisons, meta-analysis, replication, Bayesian statistics, frequentist statistics, and practical significance. These findings suggest that undergraduate psychology programmes may not emphasize statistical concepts (e.g., uncertainty) that are important for both everyday thinking and for effectively reporting and interpreting scientific research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number38037
JournalCollabra: Psychology
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date14 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sept 2022

Data Availability Statement

Data, data dictionaries, codebooks, analysis script and materials related to this study are publicly available at the University of Bristol data repository, data.bris, at https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.1dfnj8ah83uru2hupk2jqu4jvx. To facilitate reproducibility, parts of this manuscript were written by interleaving regular prose and analysis code using R Markdown. The relevant files are available at the University of Bristol data repository, data.bris, at https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.1dfnj8ah83uru2hupk2jqu4jvx and in a Code Ocean container (https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.3003399.v1) which recreates the software environment in which the original analyses were performed. This container allows parts of this manuscript to be reproduced from the data and code with a single button press.

Acknowledgements

We thank Peter Allen, Katie Drax, Daniel Lakens, and Peder Isager for useful conversation regarding this project.

Funding

Kyle Dack is supported by a PhD studentship from the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (faculty matched place for MRC and Peter and Jean James Scholarship). Robert Thibault was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec and is now supported by a general support grant awarded to METRICS from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation and postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Robbie Clark’s position is funded by the Wellcome Trust (214528/Z/18/Z). Jacqueline Thompson’s position was funded by Jisc (4956). Marcus Munafò and all other contributors are part of the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MC_UU_00011/7). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Keywords

  • education
  • meta-research
  • open science
  • psychology
  • reproducibility
  • statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistics Education in Undergraduate Psychology: A Survey of UK Curricula'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this