Statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial to compare screening, feedback and intervention for child anxiety problems to usual school practice: identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools-identification to intervention (iCATS-i2i)

Susan Ball, Tessa Reardon, Cathy Creswell, Lucy Taylor, Paul Brown, Tamsin Ford, Alastair Gray, Claire Hill, Bec Jasper, Michael Larkin, Ian Macdonald, Fran Morgan, Jack Pollard, Michelle Sancho, Falko F. Sniehotta, Susan H. Spence, Jason Stainer, Paul Stallard, Mara Violato, Obioha C. Ukoumunne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The Identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools-identification to intervention (iCATS-i2i) trial is being conducted to establish whether ‘screening and intervention’, consisting of usual school practice plus a pathway comprising screening, feedback and a brief parent-led online intervention (OSI: Online Support and Intervention for child anxiety), bring clinical and health economic benefits compared to usual school practice and assessment only — ‘usual school practice’, for children aged 8–9 years in the following: (1) the ‘target population’, who initially screen positive for anxiety problems according to a two-item parent-report child anxiety questionnaire — iCATS-2, and (2) the ‘total population’, comprising all children in participating classes. This article describes the detailed statistical analysis plan for the trial. Methods and design: iCATS-i2i is a definitive, superiority, pragmatic, school-based cluster randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot), with two parallel groups. Schools are randomised 1:1 to receive either screening and intervention or usual school practice. This article describes the following: trial objectives and outcomes; statistical analysis principles, including detailed estimand information necessary for aligning trial objectives, conduct, analyses and interpretation when there are different analysis populations and outcome measures to be considered; and planned main analyses, sensitivity and additional analyses. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN76119074.

Original languageEnglish
Article number62
JournalTrials
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2024

Funding

This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research (Reference Number: RP-PG-0218–20010). C. C. was supported by the Oxford and Thames Valley National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration. O. U. and S. B. were supported by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula. A. G. was partly supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford. M. V. was partly supported by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and receives funding from the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

FundersFunder number
NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford
Thames Valley Police
National Institute for Health and Care ResearchRP-PG-0218–20010
University of Bristol
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley

    Keywords

    • Anxiety problems
    • Cluster randomised controlled trial
    • Estimand
    • School based
    • Screening
    • Statistical analysis plan

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine (miscellaneous)
    • Pharmacology (medical)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial to compare screening, feedback and intervention for child anxiety problems to usual school practice: identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools-identification to intervention (iCATS-i2i)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this