Standardised tobacco packaging: A health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives To investigate opposition to standardised tobacco packaging in the UK. To increase understanding of how transnational corporations are adapting to changes in their access to policymakers precipitated by Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).
Design Case study web-based documentary analysis, using NVivo V.10. Examination of relationships between opponents of standardised packaging and transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) and of the volume, nature, transparency and timing of their activities.
Setting UK standardised packaging policy debate 2011–2013.
Participants Organisations selected on basis of opposition to, or facilitation thereof, standardised tobacco packaging in the UK; 422 associated documents.
Results Excluding tobacco manufacturing and packaging companies (n=12), 109 organisations were involved in opposing standardised packaging, 82 (75%) of which had a financial relationship with 1 or more TTC. These 82 organisations (43 actively opposing the measure, 39 facilitating opposition) were responsible for 60% of the 404 activities identified, including the majority of public communications and research production. TTCs were directly responsible for 28% of total activities, predominantly direct lobbying, but also financially underwrote third party research, communication, mass recruitment and lobbying. Active organisations rarely reported any financial relationship with TTCs when undertaking opposition activities.
Conclusions The multifaceted opposition to standardised packaging was primarily undertaken by third parties with financial relationships with major tobacco manufacturers. Low levels of transparency regarding these links created a misleading impression of diverse and widespread opposition. Countries should strengthen implementation of Article 5.3 of the FCTC by systematically requiring conflict of interest declarations from all organisations participating in political or media debates on tobacco control.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere012634
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalBMJ Open
Volume2016
Issue number6
Early online date7 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Product Packaging
Health Policy
Tobacco
Organizations
Lobbying
Conflict of Interest
Research

Keywords

  • Packaging
  • Industry
  • Transparency
  • Tobacco
  • Policy
  • Health

Cite this

Standardised tobacco packaging: A health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation. / Hatchard, Jenny; Fooks, Gary; Gilmore, Anna.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 2016, No. 6, e012634, 07.10.2016, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{303277b2d4ad4a7aa0626c54422e791d,
title = "Standardised tobacco packaging: A health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation",
abstract = "Objectives To investigate opposition to standardised tobacco packaging in the UK. To increase understanding of how transnational corporations are adapting to changes in their access to policymakers precipitated by Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).Design Case study web-based documentary analysis, using NVivo V.10. Examination of relationships between opponents of standardised packaging and transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) and of the volume, nature, transparency and timing of their activities.Setting UK standardised packaging policy debate 2011–2013.Participants Organisations selected on basis of opposition to, or facilitation thereof, standardised tobacco packaging in the UK; 422 associated documents.Results Excluding tobacco manufacturing and packaging companies (n=12), 109 organisations were involved in opposing standardised packaging, 82 (75{\%}) of which had a financial relationship with 1 or more TTC. These 82 organisations (43 actively opposing the measure, 39 facilitating opposition) were responsible for 60{\%} of the 404 activities identified, including the majority of public communications and research production. TTCs were directly responsible for 28{\%} of total activities, predominantly direct lobbying, but also financially underwrote third party research, communication, mass recruitment and lobbying. Active organisations rarely reported any financial relationship with TTCs when undertaking opposition activities.Conclusions The multifaceted opposition to standardised packaging was primarily undertaken by third parties with financial relationships with major tobacco manufacturers. Low levels of transparency regarding these links created a misleading impression of diverse and widespread opposition. Countries should strengthen implementation of Article 5.3 of the FCTC by systematically requiring conflict of interest declarations from all organisations participating in political or media debates on tobacco control.",
keywords = "Packaging, Industry, Transparency, Tobacco, Policy, Health",
author = "Jenny Hatchard and Gary Fooks and Anna Gilmore",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012634",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardised tobacco packaging: A health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation

AU - Hatchard, Jenny

AU - Fooks, Gary

AU - Gilmore, Anna

PY - 2016/10/7

Y1 - 2016/10/7

N2 - Objectives To investigate opposition to standardised tobacco packaging in the UK. To increase understanding of how transnational corporations are adapting to changes in their access to policymakers precipitated by Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).Design Case study web-based documentary analysis, using NVivo V.10. Examination of relationships between opponents of standardised packaging and transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) and of the volume, nature, transparency and timing of their activities.Setting UK standardised packaging policy debate 2011–2013.Participants Organisations selected on basis of opposition to, or facilitation thereof, standardised tobacco packaging in the UK; 422 associated documents.Results Excluding tobacco manufacturing and packaging companies (n=12), 109 organisations were involved in opposing standardised packaging, 82 (75%) of which had a financial relationship with 1 or more TTC. These 82 organisations (43 actively opposing the measure, 39 facilitating opposition) were responsible for 60% of the 404 activities identified, including the majority of public communications and research production. TTCs were directly responsible for 28% of total activities, predominantly direct lobbying, but also financially underwrote third party research, communication, mass recruitment and lobbying. Active organisations rarely reported any financial relationship with TTCs when undertaking opposition activities.Conclusions The multifaceted opposition to standardised packaging was primarily undertaken by third parties with financial relationships with major tobacco manufacturers. Low levels of transparency regarding these links created a misleading impression of diverse and widespread opposition. Countries should strengthen implementation of Article 5.3 of the FCTC by systematically requiring conflict of interest declarations from all organisations participating in political or media debates on tobacco control.

AB - Objectives To investigate opposition to standardised tobacco packaging in the UK. To increase understanding of how transnational corporations are adapting to changes in their access to policymakers precipitated by Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).Design Case study web-based documentary analysis, using NVivo V.10. Examination of relationships between opponents of standardised packaging and transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) and of the volume, nature, transparency and timing of their activities.Setting UK standardised packaging policy debate 2011–2013.Participants Organisations selected on basis of opposition to, or facilitation thereof, standardised tobacco packaging in the UK; 422 associated documents.Results Excluding tobacco manufacturing and packaging companies (n=12), 109 organisations were involved in opposing standardised packaging, 82 (75%) of which had a financial relationship with 1 or more TTC. These 82 organisations (43 actively opposing the measure, 39 facilitating opposition) were responsible for 60% of the 404 activities identified, including the majority of public communications and research production. TTCs were directly responsible for 28% of total activities, predominantly direct lobbying, but also financially underwrote third party research, communication, mass recruitment and lobbying. Active organisations rarely reported any financial relationship with TTCs when undertaking opposition activities.Conclusions The multifaceted opposition to standardised packaging was primarily undertaken by third parties with financial relationships with major tobacco manufacturers. Low levels of transparency regarding these links created a misleading impression of diverse and widespread opposition. Countries should strengthen implementation of Article 5.3 of the FCTC by systematically requiring conflict of interest declarations from all organisations participating in political or media debates on tobacco control.

KW - Packaging

KW - Industry

KW - Transparency

KW - Tobacco

KW - Policy

KW - Health

UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012634

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012634

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012634

M3 - Article

VL - 2016

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e012634

ER -