Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity

Rethinking Stakeholder Identification

Andrew Crane, Trish Ruebottom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we propose an adaption to stakeholder theory whereby stakeholders are conceptualized on the basis of their social identity. We begin by offering a critical review of both traditional and more recent developments in stakeholder theory, focusing in particular on the way in which stakeholder categories are identified. By identifying critical weaknesses in the existing approach, as well as important points of strength, we outline an alternative approach that refines our understanding of stakeholders in important ways. To do so, we draw on notions of social identity as the fundamental basis for group cohesion, mobilization, and action. A new form of cross-mapping as a basis for stakeholder identification is advanced and key research questions are set out.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-87
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume102
Issue numberSUPPL.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

stakeholder
group cohesion
Stakeholder theory
Stakeholders
Social identity
Stakeholder Theory
Social Identity
mobilization

Keywords

  • Corporate responsibility
  • Identity salience
  • Social identity theory
  • Stakeholder identification and classification
  • Stakeholder theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Law
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity : Rethinking Stakeholder Identification. / Crane, Andrew; Ruebottom, Trish.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 102, No. SUPPL., 03.2011, p. 77-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbc1dd45b1ef4fcfb9d581bd434afe48,
title = "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification",
abstract = "In this article, we propose an adaption to stakeholder theory whereby stakeholders are conceptualized on the basis of their social identity. We begin by offering a critical review of both traditional and more recent developments in stakeholder theory, focusing in particular on the way in which stakeholder categories are identified. By identifying critical weaknesses in the existing approach, as well as important points of strength, we outline an alternative approach that refines our understanding of stakeholders in important ways. To do so, we draw on notions of social identity as the fundamental basis for group cohesion, mobilization, and action. A new form of cross-mapping as a basis for stakeholder identification is advanced and key research questions are set out.",
keywords = "Corporate responsibility, Identity salience, Social identity theory, Stakeholder identification and classification, Stakeholder theory",
author = "Andrew Crane and Trish Ruebottom",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-011-1191-4",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "77--87",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity

T2 - Rethinking Stakeholder Identification

AU - Crane, Andrew

AU - Ruebottom, Trish

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - In this article, we propose an adaption to stakeholder theory whereby stakeholders are conceptualized on the basis of their social identity. We begin by offering a critical review of both traditional and more recent developments in stakeholder theory, focusing in particular on the way in which stakeholder categories are identified. By identifying critical weaknesses in the existing approach, as well as important points of strength, we outline an alternative approach that refines our understanding of stakeholders in important ways. To do so, we draw on notions of social identity as the fundamental basis for group cohesion, mobilization, and action. A new form of cross-mapping as a basis for stakeholder identification is advanced and key research questions are set out.

AB - In this article, we propose an adaption to stakeholder theory whereby stakeholders are conceptualized on the basis of their social identity. We begin by offering a critical review of both traditional and more recent developments in stakeholder theory, focusing in particular on the way in which stakeholder categories are identified. By identifying critical weaknesses in the existing approach, as well as important points of strength, we outline an alternative approach that refines our understanding of stakeholders in important ways. To do so, we draw on notions of social identity as the fundamental basis for group cohesion, mobilization, and action. A new form of cross-mapping as a basis for stakeholder identification is advanced and key research questions are set out.

KW - Corporate responsibility

KW - Identity salience

KW - Social identity theory

KW - Stakeholder identification and classification

KW - Stakeholder theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858702959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1191-4

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-011-1191-4

DO - 10.1007/s10551-011-1191-4

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 77

EP - 87

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - SUPPL.

ER -