Specific tackling situations affect the biomechanical demands experienced by rugby union players

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Tackling in Rugby Union is an open skill which can involve high-speed collisions and is the match event associated with the greatest proportion of injuries. The purpose of this study was to analyse the biomechanics of rugby tackling under different three movement conditions: from a stationary position, with the dominant shoulder and with the non-dominant shoulder, and moving forward, with the dominant shoulder. A specially devised contact simulator, a 50 kg punch bag instrumented with pressure sensors, was translated towards the tackler (n=15) in trials to evaluate the effect of laterality (dominant vs. non-dominant side) and tackling approach (standing vs. moving) on the external loads absorbed by the tackler, on head and trunk motion, and on trunk muscle activities. Peak impact force was substantially higher in the stationary dominant (2.84 ± 0.74 kN) than in the stationary non-dominant condition (2.44 ± 0.64 kN), but lower than in the moving condition (3.40 ± 0.86 kN). Muscle activation started on average 300 ms before impact, with higher activation for impact-side trapezius and non-impact side erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscles. Players’ technique for non-dominant side tackles was less compliant with current coaching recommendations in terms of cervical motion (more neck flexion and lateral bending were observed in the stationary non-dominant condition) and players could benefit from specific coaching focus on non-dominant side tackles.
LanguageEnglish
Pages58-75
JournalSports Biomechanics
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jul 2016
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Football
Muscles
Superficial Back Muscles
Biomechanical Phenomena
Neck
Head
Pressure
Wounds and Injuries
Mentoring

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Rugby
  • Injury prevention

Cite this

Specific tackling situations affect the biomechanical demands experienced by rugby union players. / Seminati, Elena; Cazzola, Dario; Preatoni, Ezio; Trewartha, Grant.

In: Sports Biomechanics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2017, p. 58-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d522582b04d436ab9942230d9ca0fe7,
title = "Specific tackling situations affect the biomechanical demands experienced by rugby union players",
abstract = "Tackling in Rugby Union is an open skill which can involve high-speed collisions and is the match event associated with the greatest proportion of injuries. The purpose of this study was to analyse the biomechanics of rugby tackling under different three movement conditions: from a stationary position, with the dominant shoulder and with the non-dominant shoulder, and moving forward, with the dominant shoulder. A specially devised contact simulator, a 50 kg punch bag instrumented with pressure sensors, was translated towards the tackler (n=15) in trials to evaluate the effect of laterality (dominant vs. non-dominant side) and tackling approach (standing vs. moving) on the external loads absorbed by the tackler, on head and trunk motion, and on trunk muscle activities. Peak impact force was substantially higher in the stationary dominant (2.84 ± 0.74 kN) than in the stationary non-dominant condition (2.44 ± 0.64 kN), but lower than in the moving condition (3.40 ± 0.86 kN). Muscle activation started on average 300 ms before impact, with higher activation for impact-side trapezius and non-impact side erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscles. Players’ technique for non-dominant side tackles was less compliant with current coaching recommendations in terms of cervical motion (more neck flexion and lateral bending were observed in the stationary non-dominant condition) and players could benefit from specific coaching focus on non-dominant side tackles.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Rugby, Injury prevention",
author = "Elena Seminati and Dario Cazzola and Ezio Preatoni and Grant Trewartha",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/14763141.2016.1194453",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "58--75",
journal = "Sports Biomechanics",
issn = "1476-3141",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specific tackling situations affect the biomechanical demands experienced by rugby union players

AU - Seminati,Elena

AU - Cazzola,Dario

AU - Preatoni,Ezio

AU - Trewartha,Grant

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Tackling in Rugby Union is an open skill which can involve high-speed collisions and is the match event associated with the greatest proportion of injuries. The purpose of this study was to analyse the biomechanics of rugby tackling under different three movement conditions: from a stationary position, with the dominant shoulder and with the non-dominant shoulder, and moving forward, with the dominant shoulder. A specially devised contact simulator, a 50 kg punch bag instrumented with pressure sensors, was translated towards the tackler (n=15) in trials to evaluate the effect of laterality (dominant vs. non-dominant side) and tackling approach (standing vs. moving) on the external loads absorbed by the tackler, on head and trunk motion, and on trunk muscle activities. Peak impact force was substantially higher in the stationary dominant (2.84 ± 0.74 kN) than in the stationary non-dominant condition (2.44 ± 0.64 kN), but lower than in the moving condition (3.40 ± 0.86 kN). Muscle activation started on average 300 ms before impact, with higher activation for impact-side trapezius and non-impact side erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscles. Players’ technique for non-dominant side tackles was less compliant with current coaching recommendations in terms of cervical motion (more neck flexion and lateral bending were observed in the stationary non-dominant condition) and players could benefit from specific coaching focus on non-dominant side tackles.

AB - Tackling in Rugby Union is an open skill which can involve high-speed collisions and is the match event associated with the greatest proportion of injuries. The purpose of this study was to analyse the biomechanics of rugby tackling under different three movement conditions: from a stationary position, with the dominant shoulder and with the non-dominant shoulder, and moving forward, with the dominant shoulder. A specially devised contact simulator, a 50 kg punch bag instrumented with pressure sensors, was translated towards the tackler (n=15) in trials to evaluate the effect of laterality (dominant vs. non-dominant side) and tackling approach (standing vs. moving) on the external loads absorbed by the tackler, on head and trunk motion, and on trunk muscle activities. Peak impact force was substantially higher in the stationary dominant (2.84 ± 0.74 kN) than in the stationary non-dominant condition (2.44 ± 0.64 kN), but lower than in the moving condition (3.40 ± 0.86 kN). Muscle activation started on average 300 ms before impact, with higher activation for impact-side trapezius and non-impact side erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscles. Players’ technique for non-dominant side tackles was less compliant with current coaching recommendations in terms of cervical motion (more neck flexion and lateral bending were observed in the stationary non-dominant condition) and players could benefit from specific coaching focus on non-dominant side tackles.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Rugby

KW - Injury prevention

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2016.1194453

U2 - 10.1080/14763141.2016.1194453

DO - 10.1080/14763141.2016.1194453

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 58

EP - 75

JO - Sports Biomechanics

T2 - Sports Biomechanics

JF - Sports Biomechanics

SN - 1476-3141

IS - 1

ER -