Sources of distinctiveness

position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests

Vivian L. Vignoles, Xenia Chryssochoou, Glynis M. Breakwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the implications of three sources of distinctiveness-position, difference and separateness-for identity and subjective well-being in a survey of 149 Anglican parish priests. Distinctiveness was examined within parish and clergy comparative contexts. Each source contributed substantially and uniquely to ratings of the distinctiveness associated with identity elements in each context. Parish-context position was emphasised within identity and was positive for affect, while parish-context separateness was negative for affect. Distinctiveness in the clergy context was not emphasised within identity and was unrelated to affect. This shows that distinctiveness is not a unitary construct: extending existing theories (Breakwell, 1993; Brewer, 1991; Triandis, 1995), we argue that different forms of distinctiveness will have different implications for identity and well-being according to culture and context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)761-780
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2002

Fingerprint

Clergy

Cite this

Sources of distinctiveness : position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests. / Vignoles, Vivian L.; Chryssochoou, Xenia; Breakwell, Glynis M.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 6, 11.2002, p. 761-780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2dd0661ea1894ae09db41958badee957,
title = "Sources of distinctiveness: position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests",
abstract = "We investigated the implications of three sources of distinctiveness-position, difference and separateness-for identity and subjective well-being in a survey of 149 Anglican parish priests. Distinctiveness was examined within parish and clergy comparative contexts. Each source contributed substantially and uniquely to ratings of the distinctiveness associated with identity elements in each context. Parish-context position was emphasised within identity and was positive for affect, while parish-context separateness was negative for affect. Distinctiveness in the clergy context was not emphasised within identity and was unrelated to affect. This shows that distinctiveness is not a unitary construct: extending existing theories (Breakwell, 1993; Brewer, 1991; Triandis, 1995), we argue that different forms of distinctiveness will have different implications for identity and well-being according to culture and context.",
author = "Vignoles, {Vivian L.} and Xenia Chryssochoou and Breakwell, {Glynis M.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.119",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "761--780",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of distinctiveness

T2 - position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests

AU - Vignoles, Vivian L.

AU - Chryssochoou, Xenia

AU - Breakwell, Glynis M.

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - We investigated the implications of three sources of distinctiveness-position, difference and separateness-for identity and subjective well-being in a survey of 149 Anglican parish priests. Distinctiveness was examined within parish and clergy comparative contexts. Each source contributed substantially and uniquely to ratings of the distinctiveness associated with identity elements in each context. Parish-context position was emphasised within identity and was positive for affect, while parish-context separateness was negative for affect. Distinctiveness in the clergy context was not emphasised within identity and was unrelated to affect. This shows that distinctiveness is not a unitary construct: extending existing theories (Breakwell, 1993; Brewer, 1991; Triandis, 1995), we argue that different forms of distinctiveness will have different implications for identity and well-being according to culture and context.

AB - We investigated the implications of three sources of distinctiveness-position, difference and separateness-for identity and subjective well-being in a survey of 149 Anglican parish priests. Distinctiveness was examined within parish and clergy comparative contexts. Each source contributed substantially and uniquely to ratings of the distinctiveness associated with identity elements in each context. Parish-context position was emphasised within identity and was positive for affect, while parish-context separateness was negative for affect. Distinctiveness in the clergy context was not emphasised within identity and was unrelated to affect. This shows that distinctiveness is not a unitary construct: extending existing theories (Breakwell, 1993; Brewer, 1991; Triandis, 1995), we argue that different forms of distinctiveness will have different implications for identity and well-being according to culture and context.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.119

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.119

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.119

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 761

EP - 780

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 6

ER -