Some non-classical approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox

Can Baskent

doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzv001

Some non-classical approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox

Can Baskent

Department of Computer Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

In this article, we discuss a well-known self-referential paradox in epistemic game theory, the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox. We approach the paradox from two different perspectives, non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic, and provide models in which the paradox is solved.

Original language	English
Article number	jzv001
Pages (from-to)	533-552
Number of pages	20
Journal	Logic Journal of the IGPL
Volume	23
Issue number	4
Early online date	29 Mar 2015
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzv001
Publication status	Published - 26 May 2015

Keywords

Brandenburger-Keisler paradox
Epistemic game theory
Non-well-founded sets
Paraconsistent logic
Topological models of modal logic

Access to Document

10.1093/jigpal/jzv001

Cite this

@article{8c547410ad2d404d8bcc90ba0d36c0f3,

title = "Some non-classical approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox",

abstract = "In this article, we discuss a well-known self-referential paradox in epistemic game theory, the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox. We approach the paradox from two different perspectives, non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic, and provide models in which the paradox is solved.",

keywords = "Brandenburger-Keisler paradox, Epistemic game theory, Non-well-founded sets, Paraconsistent logic, Topological models of modal logic",

author = "Can Baskent",

year = "2015",

month = may,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1093/jigpal/jzv001",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "533--552",

journal = "Logic Journal of the IGPL",

issn = "1367-0751",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some non-classical approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox

AU - Baskent, Can

PY - 2015/5/26

Y1 - 2015/5/26

N2 - In this article, we discuss a well-known self-referential paradox in epistemic game theory, the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox. We approach the paradox from two different perspectives, non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic, and provide models in which the paradox is solved.

AB - In this article, we discuss a well-known self-referential paradox in epistemic game theory, the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox. We approach the paradox from two different perspectives, non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic, and provide models in which the paradox is solved.

KW - Brandenburger-Keisler paradox

KW - Epistemic game theory

KW - Non-well-founded sets

KW - Paraconsistent logic

KW - Topological models of modal logic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939483033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzv001

U2 - 10.1093/jigpal/jzv001

DO - 10.1093/jigpal/jzv001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939483033

SN - 1367-0751

VL - 23

SP - 533

EP - 552

JO - Logic Journal of the IGPL

JF - Logic Journal of the IGPL

IS - 4

M1 - jzv001

ER -

Some non-classical approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

ALPUIS

Cite this

Some non-classical approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

ALPUIS

Cite this